EUS-FNA and ROSE in Solid Lesions of The Pancreas; Have The Same Diagnostic Efficacy Compared to Pancreatic Sites?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Various techniques, needle types, and additional methods such as on-site pathological evaluation (ROSE) are used to increase the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), which is used in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. In this study, diagnosticity of the lesions according to the regions of the pancreas with EUS-FNA and ROSE performed with the slow pull technique using a 22 G needle will be evaluated. METHODS A total of 82 patients who underwent EUS-FNA between January 2, 2015, and March 14, 2020, were included in the study. General and clinical information of the patients were recorded retrospectively. The patients were diagnosed according to The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Classification. If the diagnosis could not be made with EUS-FNA and ROSE, the diagnosis was made with alternative methods of surgery or percutaneous biopsy. Patients diagnosed as benign with EUS-FNA and ROSE were followed for at least 1 year and were accepted as benign. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 63.2±10.5 years and 54 (69.6%) of them were male. The mean lesion size was 36.8 mm and the number of needle passes was 2.87. The overall sensitivity was 82.9% and the specificity was 100%. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA and ROSE in solid lesions in the head and body of the pancreas was higher than in lesions in the tail region (p=0.024). CONCLUSION EUS-FNA and ROSE are an effective method in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. The use of a 22 G needle may be more diagnostic in the head and body of the pancreas than in the tail region.

Advances in the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Premalignant Pancreatic Lesions

“…Regarding biopsy techniques, recent advancements in EUS-FNA/FNB are also expected to improve diagnostic performance. Recent studies have begun to systematically address the optimal techniques, needle types, and additional methods and contrast agents used during EUS-FNA/FNB so that future biopsy samples are of the best quality for subsequent analysis [ 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Recently, there has been a growing preference for EUS-FNB over EUS-FNA as a means of obtaining tissue samples [ 55 , 56 , 57 ].…”