Eurytoma robusta (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), a local key factor in the population dynamics of Urophora cardui (Diptera: Tephritidae): a comparative analysis

Abstract

Abstract. Eurytoma robusta Mayr (Chalcidoidea) exploits host galls either as a primary or secondary parasitoid, an entomophytophagous inquiline or occasionally even as a predator. We present data on its ecology and impact on gall densities and population trends of the gall fly Urophora cardui (L.) on Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Habitat preference, host gall selection, clutch size, and high incidence of superparasitism causing empty gall cells show that E. robusta, a generalist with a broad host spectrum, is relatively poorly adapted to parasitising U. cardui. The influence of E. robusta on U. cardui in the Belfort-Sundgau region , in the Upper Rhine Valley (1973Valley ( -2004 and in north-eastern Bavaria (1977Bavaria ( -2004, differed considerably. In the forests of the Upper Rhine Valley and the Belfort-Sundgau region, where U. cardui has relatively stable source-sink populations, E. robusta is present but not the dominant mortality factor of the gall fly. In most areas of north-eastern Bavaria U. cardui occurs in fragmented populations and short lived non-equilibrium metapopulations. In these systems E. robusta became more abundant over the last five years, which resulted in a high incidence of superparasitism, an increase in the number of empty gall cells and reduced gall quality. The greatly increased degree of parasitism and an excess of empty cells resulted recently in the collapse of most local populations of U. cardui in the study area south of Bayreuth (north-eastern Bavaria). Together with earlier records the data presented here suggest that in northeastern Bavaria E. robusta cause fluctuations in the abundance of U. cardui, which have a periodicity of 5-7 years. A remarkable feature of the oligophagous E. robusta is its high fidelity to formerly abundant U. cardui populations, which, with declining host densities, leads to overexploitation, resulting in a high incidence of superparasitism and high larval mortality. The possible influence of the habitat structure on the effect of E. robusta on the population dynamics of U. cardui is discussed. Our data plus that of other authors suggest that, with regard to U. cardui, E. robusta can develop a temporary local host specialisation.

Eurytoma serratulae and E. robusta (Hymenoptera, Eurytomidae): complementary host exploitation strategies of coexisting parasitoids and their impact on the host Urophora cardui

“…For its oviposition E. robusta is dependent on galls with fully developed cells, where synchronisation problems can lead to mortality of the young host larvae and starvation of the E. robusta larvae. Frequent and often high superparasitism of E. robusta (Zwölfer et al 2007) can result in a considerable waste of eggs. As an initiator of empty cells E. robusta is an important mortality factor of U. cardui (Fig.…”

“…Eurytoma robusta often suffers from a high incidence of superparasitism. Zwölfer et al (2007) give a detailed description of the biology of E. robusta and the part it plays in the population dynamics of its host U. cardui.…”

“…3, which compares the average content of single galls of the different size classes. The graph includes the galls with empty cells, which usually are caused by E. robusta (Zwölfer et al 2007). This species is represented together with a small ( < 5%) proportion of Pteromalus elevatus, a rare ectoparasitoid of U. cardui.…”

“…with regard to gall density / thistle patch, which is a rough estimate of the quantity of galls in a thistle patch (E. serratulae = 688 samples; E. robusta = 1093 samples). The analysed samples represent average densities of locally and temporally fluctuating parasitoid-host complexes (Zwölfer 1994, Zwölfer et al 2007. If analysed for five classes of sample sizes (Fig.…”

“…The parasitization rates of E. serratulae and E. robusta vary temporally and locally with the population dynamics of U. cardui (Zwölfer et al 2007). These fluctuations are superimposed by regional differences (Fig.…”