2010
DOI: 10.1080/07036330903274664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Europeanization, Domestic Legacies and Administrative Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Hungary and the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These various classifications emphasize two main features of the Bulgarian public sector -its Ottoman legacy that translates into inefficiency and a high level of corruption, and its communist legacy that translates into highly centralized system, strong control of the former nomenklatura, and a great degree of politicization (Zankina, 2018, p. 82). These administrative traditions and legacies played an important role in shaping public administration reform (Camyar, 2010;Meyer-Sahling and Yesilkagit, 2011;Meyer-Sahling, 2009), as new systems were influenced by the Soviet system (Meyer-Sahling and Yesilkagit, 2011;Baker, 2002).…”
Section: Overview Of Early Reform Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These various classifications emphasize two main features of the Bulgarian public sector -its Ottoman legacy that translates into inefficiency and a high level of corruption, and its communist legacy that translates into highly centralized system, strong control of the former nomenklatura, and a great degree of politicization (Zankina, 2018, p. 82). These administrative traditions and legacies played an important role in shaping public administration reform (Camyar, 2010;Meyer-Sahling and Yesilkagit, 2011;Meyer-Sahling, 2009), as new systems were influenced by the Soviet system (Meyer-Sahling and Yesilkagit, 2011;Baker, 2002).…”
Section: Overview Of Early Reform Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant differences, CEE countries all shared a common past under Communism, including Soviet-style administrative systems: highly centralized, with no clear separation between the party and the state apparatus, and with selection for management positions based on a nomenklatura system, which stressed ideological and political loyalty rather than merit (Meyer-Sahling and Veen, 2012). These common administrative traditions and legacies played an important role in shaping civil service reform in CEE (Camyar, 2010;Meyer-Sahling and Yesilkagit, 2011;Meyer-Sahling, 2009), because civil service systems were, in most cases, not created from a clean slate. Rather, they reflected an evolving baggage of norms and beliefs carried from the past that framed and guided future actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on a survey of municipal health‐care officials in Serbia, the article contributes to our understanding the impact of domestic variables and ‘legacies of deep conditions’ (Cirtautas and Schimmelfennig, ; Elbasani, ). In contrast to existing studies on the Europeanization of public administration in post‐communist settings, which typically assess the impact of conditionality at state and country level (Caymar, ; Dimitrova, ), we focus on municipal officials and ask whether exposure to EU processes and training is transforming attitudes to corruption among health‐care professionals at the local level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the impact of the European Union (EU) on the professionalization of public administration in Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs)? Research on the Europeanization of public administration in post-communist CEECs has long focused on the impact of EU conditionality (Camyar, 2010; Dimitrova, 2005). The development of administrative capacity was one of the conditions for EU membership (Dimitrova, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%