2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108654173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Union Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominance of Directives in the data is perhaps unsurprising given that Directives are the most common EU legal instrument, followed by Regulations as the data again demonstrates. 134 Directives are generalised pieces of legislation which set out policy goals to be attained by the Member States and are binding as to the result to be achieved. 135 They grant national policy-makers the freedom to select the most appropriate method of attaining these goals within the domestic system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominance of Directives in the data is perhaps unsurprising given that Directives are the most common EU legal instrument, followed by Regulations as the data again demonstrates. 134 Directives are generalised pieces of legislation which set out policy goals to be attained by the Member States and are binding as to the result to be achieved. 135 They grant national policy-makers the freedom to select the most appropriate method of attaining these goals within the domestic system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the Court allowes competition authorities a certain margin of discretion regarding the economic method to define excessive prices, but each method has its own weaknesses.37 A-G Wahl correctly concluded that the proper approach is, where possible, to combine several methods to avoid the risk of errors.38 Still, defining the line between reasonable high and unreasonable high price remains difficult. 39 Once the excessiveness has been confirmed, it must be determined whether the price is unfair, or can be justified for objective reasons. The 'fairness test' requires an analysis of the economic reasons for its pricing policy.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State behaviour varies according to the stimuli, but for the resulting legal norm to be efficient, the benefits must outweigh the costs of the contextual factors among all the possible alternatives (Hylton 2019 ; Zerbe 2019 ). In the case of energy transition regulations, even this binomial solution could be coupled with the effectiveness and magnitude of possible sanctions, discounting the possibility of detecting the national transgression of the legal regulatory framework (Chalmers et al 2019 ; Hylton 2019 ). Thus, for example, if the EU detects only one in ten national transgressions to its energy transition regulations, the real cost would be X/10 (Bullard 2018 ).…”
Section: Energy Regulation: Presentation and Economic Analysis Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%