2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2542823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European-Type Electricity Market Clearing Model Incorporating PUN Orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Markets are cleared in the Nordic region as in the rest of Western Europe without unit commitment [25], [28]. Thus, in order to provide credible insights, our model needs to reflect market operations.…”
Section: Research Objectives and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• Markets are cleared in the Nordic region as in the rest of Western Europe without unit commitment [25], [28]. Thus, in order to provide credible insights, our model needs to reflect market operations.…”
Section: Research Objectives and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (24) is the loop-flow constraint for the AC lines using a DC load-flow linearization based on Kirchhoff's current law in a circuit. Constraints (25) and (26) ensure that the maximum capacities of transmission lines ℓ ∈ L are not exceeded. Constraint (27) sets the slack node for the DC load-flow in the AC circuit.…”
Section: A Decision-making Problems 1) Producers I ∈ Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to the UPP scheme, reference [33] proposes a complementarity approach to solve a clearing problem un-der mixed pricing rules, which is further extended to reserves in [34], and block orders in [35]. In the latter case, an iterative process is implemented which involves an initial MILP problem to handle block orders, followed by a mixed-complementarity problem to deal with the UPP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Section the differences between the models presented above and the model that have presented in Section 0 (hereinafter Model 1) and the model presented in [55] (hereinafter Model 2) are highlighted, as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%