2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European seroepidemiology network 2: Standardisation of assays for seroepidemiology of varicella zoster virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentration of VZV-specific IgG antibody (VZV-IgG) in serum was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Dade-Behring Enzygnost Immunoassay kit) as already described. Corrected absorbance values were converted to log 10 mIU/ml and the results were classified as negative (values Ͻ50 mIU/ml), equivocal (between 50 and 100 mIU/ml), and positive (Ͼ100 mIU/ml) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentration of VZV-specific IgG antibody (VZV-IgG) in serum was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Dade-Behring Enzygnost Immunoassay kit) as already described. Corrected absorbance values were converted to log 10 mIU/ml and the results were classified as negative (values Ͻ50 mIU/ml), equivocal (between 50 and 100 mIU/ml), and positive (Ͼ100 mIU/ml) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been applied successfully for various vaccine-preventable infections during the ESEN projects, i.e. : (i) measles, mumps, rubella [16,20] ; (ii) pertussis [17] ; (iii) diphtheria [19]) ; (iv) VZV [18] ; and (v) HBV [21]. The present collaborative work describes the development of a standardization procedure that allows for direct comparisons of HAV seroprevalence data generated at 15 European laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inter-laboratory variation, even when using the same EIA and international standards, is a well-recognized problem [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]; accordingly, differences mostly in sensitivity, but also in specificity, have been reported for both commercial and in-house anti-HAV assays [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Standardization is a methodological approach that provides a means to overcome this limitation and to ensure the direct comparability of seroepidemiological results obtained during the project [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are generally sufficiently sensitive in subjects with a history of natural infection, but not sufficiently sensitive to detect seroconversion after vaccination as the antibody titres induced by vaccination are a logarithm lower than in the case of natural infection [5,30,54,380,393,397] . In vaccinated subjects, the tests are less sensitive than FAMA as studies have found that 58%-88% of the subjects who were negative or borderline at ELISA were positive to FAMA, which uses surface antigens [91,96,402,403] .…”
Section: Elisas and Eiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbiology laboratory in mother-child VZV infection standardised tests has led to the production of CLIAs against international standards. The proposed cut-off values are 150 mIU/mL [414] or 100 mIU/mL (negative < 50 mIU/mL; doubtful 50-100 mIU/mL; positive > 100 mIU/mL) [327,403] . Their ability to give a quantitative result makes it easier to distinguish protected and unprotected subjects: For example, when they were used before VZIG administration to test women exposed to VZV during pregnancy, it was found that the women with CLIA (or TRFIA) values of < 100 mIU/mL were more likely to develop varicella than those with values of > 100 mIU/mL [253] .…”
Section: Gpelisamentioning
confidence: 99%