1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02106097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: Assessment of precision, stability and accuracy the European quantitation of osteoporosis study group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine variability between centers was monitored using the European Spine Phantom and the pQCT scanners using the European Forearm phantom; where necessary, cross‐calibration was performed 41, 42, 43, 44. Standard manufacturer procedures were followed for daily quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) and all phantom and scan analysis were centralized to one center (Manchester Academic Health Sciences & University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; JEA) for grading, analysis, and collation of a harmonized database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine variability between centers was monitored using the European Spine Phantom and the pQCT scanners using the European Forearm phantom; where necessary, cross‐calibration was performed 41, 42, 43, 44. Standard manufacturer procedures were followed for daily quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) and all phantom and scan analysis were centralized to one center (Manchester Academic Health Sciences & University of Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; JEA) for grading, analysis, and collation of a harmonized database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The measurements by different machines were standardised using the European spine phantom and the method described by Pearson and collegues. 17 Next, the BMD values were converted into T-scores by comparison with the mean and standard deviation of the BMD values in a reference population of young healthy women. For example, a T-score of -1 indicates that the BMD of the subject is 1 standard deviation below the mean.…”
Section: Bmd Values and Gold Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where y is measured density and x is specified density, as described by Pearson et al [5]. All bone density measurements were then converted to standardized densities using Eq.…”
Section: Dxa and Cross-calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the EVOS centres have used densitometers made by different manufacturers, it was important first to cross-calibrate the measurements obtained. An approach to doing this using the Et~opean Spine Phantom (ESP) and its predecessor the ESP prototype (ESPp) has recently been published [4][5][6]. We have found substantial differences in BMD between populations that cannot be accounted for by variations in height, weight or selection bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%