2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
154
0
33

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
(229 reference statements)
6
154
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…Most often, the adult ratio of 30:2 was applied. According to the ERC guidelines, lay people, only trained in adult BLS, may use this ratio in the resuscitation of children [8, 16]. However, since asphyxial etiologies of cardiac arrest are more prevalent in children, medical professionals trained in PBLS are expected to resuscitate children with a ratio of 15:2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most often, the adult ratio of 30:2 was applied. According to the ERC guidelines, lay people, only trained in adult BLS, may use this ratio in the resuscitation of children [8, 16]. However, since asphyxial etiologies of cardiac arrest are more prevalent in children, medical professionals trained in PBLS are expected to resuscitate children with a ratio of 15:2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERC considers the use of lower fidelity manikins appropriate for all levels of training [8]. Moreover, the only skill guide available for the Resusci® Junior Basic until now does not generate quantitative, storable data, and does not provide feedback on all aspects of compressions and ventilations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, almost half of Polish ICUs declaring use of TTM were treating more than 20 patients per year with TTM, compared to only 15% currently (Table 3; c 2 , p < 0.001). This may have an impact on the TTM experience of the staff, and may be associated with patient outcome [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this demand a 2009 survey suggests that the reality of application of this training method lacks behind in Germany: only about 67% of the surveyed hospitals offered resuscitation training and only 55% thereof more often than once a year [10]. Whereas the optimal frequency of life support trainings is still unclear, it is suggested that frequent manikin-based refresher training may save costs and reduce the total time for retraining [11]. Looking at manikin-based resuscitation training as a simple version of simulation trainings these numbers could indicate very limited prevalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%