2016
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01090-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia

Abstract: The diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia is often confirmed with standard, albeit complex and expensive tests. In many cases, however, the diagnosis remains difficult despite the array of sophisticated diagnostic tests. There is no ‘gold standard’ reference test. Hence, a task force supported by the European Respiratory Society has developed this guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations on diagnostic testing, especially in the light of new developments in such tests, and the need for robust diagn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
656
0
41

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(708 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
6
656
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…TEM was once the "gold standard" for PCD diagnosis. However, it is now known that 15-20% of PCD cases have disease-causative mutations but normal ultrastructure by TEM [30,39,[41][42][43]. A quantitative approach to cilia evaluation is recommended, but there is no agreement on the minimal number of cilia scored or on the terminology used for ultrastructural defects.…”
Section: Standardising Reporting On Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…TEM was once the "gold standard" for PCD diagnosis. However, it is now known that 15-20% of PCD cases have disease-causative mutations but normal ultrastructure by TEM [30,39,[41][42][43]. A quantitative approach to cilia evaluation is recommended, but there is no agreement on the minimal number of cilia scored or on the terminology used for ultrastructural defects.…”
Section: Standardising Reporting On Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERS guidelines argue that nNO should not be used in isolation or as a general screening test, as it would perform poorly in populations with low prevalence of PCD (e.g. primary and secondary care settings) [36], but instead should contribute to the final diagnostic decision [30].…”
Section: Standardising Reporting On Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations