2008
DOI: 10.1080/00343400701874206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Planning and the Polycentric Consensus: Wishful Thinking?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning polycentricity, as pointed out by several authors (Davoudi, 2003;Vandermotten, Halbert, Roelandts, & Cornut, 2008), there is a general lack of empirical assessment about its actual role, particularly in terms of environmental sustainability. Some authors stressed the role of mass transit connecting centres (Cervero, 1995;Newman & Kenworthy, 1999).…”
Section: Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning polycentricity, as pointed out by several authors (Davoudi, 2003;Vandermotten, Halbert, Roelandts, & Cornut, 2008), there is a general lack of empirical assessment about its actual role, particularly in terms of environmental sustainability. Some authors stressed the role of mass transit connecting centres (Cervero, 1995;Newman & Kenworthy, 1999).…”
Section: Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one study has shown that the higher the household income, the less the commuting time [27]. Most research pertaining to the relationship between polycentric urban development and patterns of commuting among various socio-demographic groups refers to cities in developed countries of Europe and North America [8,[28][29][30]. However, there has been comparatively little research in cities of China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…London and Paris) and inter-urban (e.g. Randstad) (Klosterman & Musterd 2001), while polycentrism is a normative and prescriptive political concept (Vandermotten et al 2008). Polycentricity is often perceived as "a self-explanatory concept, characterising something that is opposite to monocentric on the one hand and dispersal and sprawl on the other" (ESPON 1.1.1 2005:51), but it should not be confused with territorial networking at multiple scales.…”
Section: Conceptualising Regional Territories Within Relational Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%