2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European multicenter propensity score match study of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for splenic flexure carcinomas: Results from the Splenic Flexure Cancer (SFC) Study Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our overall morbidity is higher (31.9% vs. 18.8%), but severe morbidity is comparable (2.1% vs. [16,22]. The relatively good performance status of the majority of our patients may have contributed to the good 5-year OS of 89.6%.…”
Section: Ta B L E 4 Features Of Patients Who Developed Recurrence Aft...mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our overall morbidity is higher (31.9% vs. 18.8%), but severe morbidity is comparable (2.1% vs. [16,22]. The relatively good performance status of the majority of our patients may have contributed to the good 5-year OS of 89.6%.…”
Section: Ta B L E 4 Features Of Patients Who Developed Recurrence Aft...mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…depicts the oncological outcomes for SFC in the recent literature[15][16][17][18][19][20]22] and our study. We obtained R0 resection in all patients intended for curative resection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, there was not a significant difference between the 2 groups for the rest of the parameters, including operation time, R0 resection, reoperation rate, anastomotic leakage, mortality rate, inpatient time, and postoperative complications. Degiuli et al [20] 2020 100 314 414 ERC vs LC Arévalo et al [21] 2018 59 60 119 ERC vs LC De'Angelis et al [6] 2016 27 27 54 ERC vs LC Garavante et al [10] 2016 64 34 98 ERC vs LC Odermatt et al [7] 2014 38 30 68 ERC vs LC Rega et al [22] 2019 22 24 46 ERC vs LC De'Angelis et al [23] 2020 134 131 265 ERC vs LC Han et al [24] 2010 55 35 90 Open vs labaroscopic Nakashima et al [25] 2011 22 33 55 Open vs labaroscopic Okuda et al [26] 2016 34 61 95 Open vs labaroscopic Kim et al [27] 2017 18 33 51 Open vs labaroscopic Beghdadi et al [28] 2021 64 64 128 Open vs labaroscopic Chi et al [29] 2018 62 62 124 Open vs labaroscopic Pedrazzani et al [30] 2021 130 130 260 Open vs labaroscopic ERC = extended right colectomy, LC = left colectomy. www.md-journal.com…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They retrospectively analysed 62 patients submitted to laparoscopy and 62 patients to open surgery and found no differences in short‐term outcomes and long‐term prognosis. Finally, Beghdadi et al [ 36 ] evaluated the results of laparoscopic surgery for SFC in a multicentric European setting. Although the study population was quite large (399 patients with SFC), after application of PSM only 64 patients treated by laparotomy and 64 with laparoscopy were analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%