European Economic Integration and South-East Europe

Liebscher, Klaus; Christl, Josef; Mooslechner, Peter; Ritzberger-Grünwald, Doris

doi:10.4337/9781845428129

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Croatia has positive inclination on capacity utilization according to our analysis (Table 2), which can be interpreted as increased business activity. More solid results are found on annual labor productivity growth, where the statistical significance (p < 0.05) indicates employment of capital-intensive sectors (Lane et al, 2002;Liebscher, 2005). In the tests conducted for this country we also find optimistic movements of proportion of total sales that are exported directly and proportion of total sales that are exported indirectly, however it can be said that there is just slight evidence that this is the case.…”

Section: Results and Effectsmentioning

confidence: 61%

Effects of foreign direct investments. Evidence from Southeast Europe

Apostolov

2016

Cuadernos de Economía

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

JEL CLASSIFICATIOND01Abstract The purpose and research objective of this study is probing effects of foreign direct investments in Southeast Europe economies. For this purpose six countries have been chosen and a sample has been drawn for: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia.In order to conduct this analysis we use Enterprise Surveys available by the World Bank which are done using firm-level data of a representative sample of economy's private sectors. The conception of this analysis is examining the effects of how foreign direct investments contribute to the development of domestic firms and the overall economy. In general, foreign direct investment is defined as dominant or controlling ownership of a company in one country, by an entity based in another country. As of the beginning of the transition process, foreign direct investments remain priority, as essential pillar, that moves forward the society toward developed market economy.The data used in this article are analyzed with an econometric model, which as employed in this study examines the interrelationships between output and set of variables that influence FDI patterns. Further, we are interested in the way foreign direct investments shape the economy. © 2015 Asociación Cuadernos de Economía. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. CÓDIGOS JELD01; F21; G11; G31; L33; O11; P31 Efectos de las inversiones extranjeras directas. Evidencia del sudeste europeoResumen El propósito y el objetivo de la investigación del presente estudio son la indagación de los efectos de las inversiones extranjeras directas en las economías del sudeste europeo. A tal fin, se han elegido 6 países, recogiéndose una muestra para Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croacia, Macedonia, Serbia y Eslovenia.A fin de realizar este análisis, utilizamos encuestas empresariales procedentes del Banco Mundial, preparadas a partir de la información empresarial de una muestra representativa

show abstract

Section: Results and Effectsmentioning

confidence: 61%

Effects of foreign direct investments. Evidence from Southeast Europe

Apostolov

2016

Cuadernos de Economía

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More solid results are found on annual employment growth, where the statistical significance (p < 0.01) indicates employment sparked by influx of fresh capital (most notably from abroad) and preferably into capital-intensive sectors (Lane et al 2002;Liebscher 2005). In the tests conducted for this country, we also find pessimistic movements of proportion of total sales that are exported indirectly (p < 0.01), a serious indication that domestic companies are lagging in creation of competitive output.…”

Section: Results and Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nonetheless, Southeast European countries have accepted, more or less, a general approach to shaping the investment environment ( Fig. 1) (Liebscher 2005). Such policies gave beneficial effects in determining FDI flows.…”

Section: Theoretical and Literature Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cobb–Douglas production function on FDI in Southeast Europe

Apostolov

2016

Economic Structures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The hydrazonoyl chlorides 1a,b,d-g [20] and the isocyanides 3b,c [21], 3d [22], 3e [23], and 3g-k [24] were prepared according to (or by adopting) literature procedures. Known products were identified by means of authentic samples and/or literature data, as were the 1,2,3-triazoles 7 a [25] and 7 b , c [26], the 1,2,4,5-tetrazine 9b [27], the 1,2,4-triazoles 13a [7] and 13b [13], the ureas 25 c [28], 25 d [29], 25 g [30], and 25 j [31], the 1,2,4triazoles 27a [32], 27d [33], and 27e [34].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%