2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European decision support modelling of long-term external doses received in inhabited areas contaminated by a nuclear power plant accident – 2: Post deposition contaminant mobility on outdoor surfaces

Abstract: To enable estimation of time-integrated external doses to persons staying in an inhabited area radioactively contaminated by aerosols and gases released in connection with a large nuclear power plant accident, additional knowledge to that described in the first part of this paper is needed on the postdeposition migration of different types of contaminants on the various relevant types of environmental surface. This part of the paper describes how the migration processes are modelled dynamically in the European… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the long-term dose contribution from radioactive contaminants on the street is of less concern as weathering processes on these surfaces have been found to be rapid (e.g. by Hinrichsen and Andersson 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the long-term dose contribution from radioactive contaminants on the street is of less concern as weathering processes on these surfaces have been found to be rapid (e.g. by Hinrichsen and Andersson 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be borne in mind that this study represents an extreme case in which gamma-emitting contamination on the ground surface was modelled. In reality, radioactive contamination penetrates into the ground, and will migrate downwards over time 7,22 . According to previous findings (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation