DOI: 10.26481/dis.20070913ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Commission Revealed? The European Commission and the Enlargement

Abstract: den Bossche (voorzitter) Prof. dr. T. Blom Prof.em. dr. Raoul Van Caenegem (Universiteit Gent) 157 4.7 CONCLUSION 160 5. THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 121 5.1 INTRODUCTION 163 5.2 THE EC TREATY, THE REGULATION AND THE EEA 165 5.3 EEA ORGANISATION AND WEAKNESSES 167 5.4 THE DG ENVIRONMENT-EEA RELATIONSHIP 170 5.5 RESTRUCTURING AND REORGANISING THE EEA 175 5.6 EEA AND THE ENLARGEMENT 180 5.7 CONCLUSION 183

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preliminary surface investigation by means of AFM permitted to ensure that the RMS of the samples is low enough to avoid major influence on the evaluation of their mechanical properties [7]. Anyway, all the factors which usually affect the nanoindentation measurements (i.e.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preliminary surface investigation by means of AFM permitted to ensure that the RMS of the samples is low enough to avoid major influence on the evaluation of their mechanical properties [7]. Anyway, all the factors which usually affect the nanoindentation measurements (i.e.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the areal error map, quantitative surface parameters are needed for surface characterization in 3D. Although there is a lack of standard parameters for 3D surface characterization, there are some standards relating to the analysis of 3D areal surface texture, including ISO 25178 and EUR 15178 EN [17]. The 3D surface parameters can be classified into five groups, including Height parameters, Functional parameters, Spatial parameters, Hybrid parameters and Features parameters.…”
Section: Automatic Surface Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then roughness parameters related to the height distribution were calculated. The roughness parameters are defined by the standards ISO 25178-2 and EUR 15178N [12,13], as shown in table 1. The reformed parameters S bi * , S ci * and S vi * are defined in previous reported research [19] as modifications to the parameters in the standard, and the algorithms are given in the appendix B.…”
Section: Parameters Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate these surfaces, parameter sets, rather than single parameter for whole profile, were developed based on different functional regions or height stratification [11]. Most methods are derived from the Abbott curve: the core height S k parameter set, volume functional parameter set and the probability material ratio method [12,13]. These surfaces are classified as bi-Gaussian surfaces, because they are combinations of a low rough upper Gaussian surface and a high rough valley Gaussian surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%