Memory and Securitization in Contemporary Europe 2018
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95269-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Europe on the Global Screen: Geopolitical Scotoma, Transnational Cinema of Memory and Hollywood’s Security Choices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like other forms of Danish programming, Ambassador is careful to present a ‘neatly packaged’ and ‘recognisable’ televisual idyll of Denmark (Stougaard-Nielsen, 2016: 6), where performances of hygge , pro-LGBTQ sentiment, and cool Nordicness are cast against impeccable aesthetics, dramatic landscapes, and iconic architecture. Moreover, in DR’s representation of Gifford as Scandinavian-smitten homo globalis and a body that evinces ‘encounter between sexuality and diplomatic history’ (Bradley, 2015: 61), there is a connived example of what Strukov (2018) terms ‘geopolitical scotoma’ at work, 9 wherein Danes are gazing at a ‘good American’ that both likes them and is like them . Moreover, as a gay man that embraces all the trappings of the ‘good life’ within the context of ‘sanitised homosexuality’, Gifford manifests both a form of homonationalism that privileges the ‘upward distribution of wealth’ (Schotten, 2016: 354) and the Obama administration’s promotion of LGBTQ ‘normalcy’ within a construct of ‘universal human rights’ (Weber, 2016: 21).…”
Section: Contextualisation In Lieu Of a Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other forms of Danish programming, Ambassador is careful to present a ‘neatly packaged’ and ‘recognisable’ televisual idyll of Denmark (Stougaard-Nielsen, 2016: 6), where performances of hygge , pro-LGBTQ sentiment, and cool Nordicness are cast against impeccable aesthetics, dramatic landscapes, and iconic architecture. Moreover, in DR’s representation of Gifford as Scandinavian-smitten homo globalis and a body that evinces ‘encounter between sexuality and diplomatic history’ (Bradley, 2015: 61), there is a connived example of what Strukov (2018) terms ‘geopolitical scotoma’ at work, 9 wherein Danes are gazing at a ‘good American’ that both likes them and is like them . Moreover, as a gay man that embraces all the trappings of the ‘good life’ within the context of ‘sanitised homosexuality’, Gifford manifests both a form of homonationalism that privileges the ‘upward distribution of wealth’ (Schotten, 2016: 354) and the Obama administration’s promotion of LGBTQ ‘normalcy’ within a construct of ‘universal human rights’ (Weber, 2016: 21).…”
Section: Contextualisation In Lieu Of a Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%