Handbuch Politische Kommunikation 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_27-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Europäische Öffentlichkeit unter dem Einfluss von Digitalisierung und Politisierung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited recognition of Europarties in the European public relates to the fact that they confront other institutional and electoral conditions in approaching voters than national parties (van Hecke & Wolfs, 2018). Although national media outlets have Europeanized their broadcasted content to some extent (Peglis, 2015), because coverage of European issues -particularly political and economic crises -increase the visibility of EU politics in national media (Benert & Pfetsch, 2020), such Europeanization has not generally improved the visibility of Europarties in the media. On the contrary, the media focus has remained on executive EU actors and the political outcomes of intergovernmental discussions, not on transnational political debates between party ideologies at the European level (Auel & Tiemann, 2020;Peglis, 2015).…”
Section: The Eu's Democratic Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The limited recognition of Europarties in the European public relates to the fact that they confront other institutional and electoral conditions in approaching voters than national parties (van Hecke & Wolfs, 2018). Although national media outlets have Europeanized their broadcasted content to some extent (Peglis, 2015), because coverage of European issues -particularly political and economic crises -increase the visibility of EU politics in national media (Benert & Pfetsch, 2020), such Europeanization has not generally improved the visibility of Europarties in the media. On the contrary, the media focus has remained on executive EU actors and the political outcomes of intergovernmental discussions, not on transnational political debates between party ideologies at the European level (Auel & Tiemann, 2020;Peglis, 2015).…”
Section: The Eu's Democratic Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media platforms such as Facebook offer Europarties the opportunity to spread their messages independently from national media outlets by bypassing their traditional gatekeepers to directly inform and mobilize voters (Larsson, 2016). Social media platforms also have the potential of transnational connectivity (Benert & Pfetsch, 2020) due to their accessibility for most EU citizens (Newman, 2021). Even if the emergence of a genuine European public sphere from social media can hardly be expected, European actors can indeed reach voters more directly via social media than via the detour of national media.…”
Section: Election Campaigning On Social Media: European Versus Nation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Risse, 2014; Picard, 2015; Bobba & Seddone, 2017; Kaiser & Kleinen-von Königslöw, 2017; Dutceac Segesten & Bossetta, 2019). The political and economic crises have led to an increased focus on European politics, which in turn has led to a Europeanisation of the political public sphere (Benert & Pfetsch, 2021).…”
Section: Dimensions Of Europeanisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, never before have so many issues affected the EU as a whole. During the euro crisis or the so-called 'refugee crisis', it was already obvious that polarising issues can cause the interests of national media audiences to converge (Benert & Pfetsch, 2021). This does, however, raise the question of whether different countries' media reporting on what is happening in other countries is what Habermas (2009) had in mind when he referred to the normative goal of a common public sphere, especially when such mutual thematisation appears to be couched primarily in terms of blame narratives (Müller et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%