2022
DOI: 10.1111/obes.12486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euro Area Periphery Countries' Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy Surprises*

Abstract: We estimate local projections to explore how fiscal policy in euro area periphery countries responds to monetary policy shocks that lower sovereign bond yields. In particular, we assess whether the disciplining effect of financial markets on public finances is undermined by the ability of monetary policy to affect the conditions of external funds. We find that the fiscal balance, on average, improves in response to monetary policy surprises that bring down yields on sovereign bonds.JEL Classification numbers: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first examine spillovers from EA monetary policy by estimating a range of bilateral regressions employing the local projection method of Jòrda (2005), recently applied in the context of monetary policy in Hülsewig and Rottmann (2022). These simple regressions allow us to examine the direct effect of the monetary policy shock on a particular variable – excluding feedback from the remaining set of variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first examine spillovers from EA monetary policy by estimating a range of bilateral regressions employing the local projection method of Jòrda (2005), recently applied in the context of monetary policy in Hülsewig and Rottmann (2022). These simple regressions allow us to examine the direct effect of the monetary policy shock on a particular variable – excluding feedback from the remaining set of variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we use an external instrument to measure changes in the monetary policy stance, we do not have to make any further identification assumptions such as about the timing of shocks (recursive identification) or the behaviour of other macroeconomic variables (sign restrictions). For recent studies that use local projections coupled with high frequency identified measures of monetary policy, see Blot, Hubert, and Labondance (2020) who investigate the effects of monetary policy on equity and housing prices and Hülsewig and Rottmann (2022) who assess the monetary and fiscal policy nexus. Following Gertler and Karadi (2015), we aggregate the daily target surprise series to monthly frequency by first creating a cumulative daily surprise series and second taking monthly averages of this series.…”
Section: Data and Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in government bond holdings coincided with the period of tighter macroprudential capital regulation (see Figure 2 further below). Moreover, in several euro area countries, government debt as a share of GDP increased at that time (Hülsewig and Rottmann, 2022). Finally, a number of studies discusses the government's incentive to finance public expenditure by means of borrowing instead of raising taxes (Feldstein, 1985;Alesina and Perotti, 1995;Hamilton and Flavin, 1986;Roubini and Sachs, 1989;D'Erasmo et al, 2016, among others).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article (Wu H. et al, 2022) examines the interaction and optimal combination of fiscal and monetary policy, when the model includes the monopoly of state enterprises and financial repression. The authors of the scientific work (Hülsewig O. et al, 2022) evaluated local forecasts to investigate how fiscal policy in the eurozone periphery responds to monetary policy shocks that lower government bond yields. The practical value of research (Xiaoshan Chen et al, 2022) lies in the analysis of a model in which fiscal and monetary policies obey the rules of targeting of different political bodies with potentially different target functions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%