2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EURADOS intercomparison exercise on MC modeling for the in-vivo monitoring of Am-241 in skull phantoms (Part I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison exercise was finished by 15 of the 16 participants which solved task one (Vrba et al, 2014b). Five of the participants (one third) needed revision or help with their simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison exercise was finished by 15 of the 16 participants which solved task one (Vrba et al, 2014b). Five of the participants (one third) needed revision or help with their simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that only the radioactive bone in half of the BPAM-001 phantom was used for the source of the primary particles (photons). Yields and energy of the photons emitted during decay of 241 Am were stated in the main inter-comparison document and is same as for task one (Vrba et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Task Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This task was for participants who had already calibrated their PBC system previously with another physical skull phantom or who are using Monte Carlo methods to calibrate their systems. Several of the participants also participated in the EURADOS Monte Carlo skull phantom intercomparison (Vrba et al, 2015;Vrba et al, 2014b). To be consistent, the same participant ID was used here, for those who participated in both intercomparisons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though calibration must be performed with physical source (according to the accreditation authorities requirements). Although Monte Carlo calculation is not considered by accreditation authorities, it is often used for the preliminary calibration, for example, for choosing appropriate measurements geometry [1], material for phantoms or for interlaboratory comparison purposes [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%