1984
DOI: 10.1016/0307-904x(84)90062-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eulerian and Lagrangian predictions of particulate two-phase flows: a numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
12

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
105
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…By solving particle trajectories for particles from several different initial locations, airflow with particles can be simulated and information about particle deposition can be obtained. (Durst et al, 1984;Gouesbet & Berlemont, 1999). In general, Lagrangian simulations require less conceptual modeling and capture more of the fundamental physics involved in particle motion, but at a much greater computational cost.…”
Section: Methods: Empiricism Eulerian Models and Lagrangian Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By solving particle trajectories for particles from several different initial locations, airflow with particles can be simulated and information about particle deposition can be obtained. (Durst et al, 1984;Gouesbet & Berlemont, 1999). In general, Lagrangian simulations require less conceptual modeling and capture more of the fundamental physics involved in particle motion, but at a much greater computational cost.…”
Section: Methods: Empiricism Eulerian Models and Lagrangian Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Two-Fluid mode1 treats particles as a second fluid with a distinct velocity froni the gas-phase, (Durst et al (1984)). The particle phase is treated as a continuum without a pressure term in the equation of motion since the pressure gradient effects are already included in the drag coefficient.…”
Section: Two-fluid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below, a brief description of the two methods is given. For further details and a comparison of the results of the two methods the reader is referred to the following literature: Durst et al [29], Crowe et al [21], Loth [86] and Wachem and Almstedt [140].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%