1993
DOI: 10.1016/0262-8856(93)90055-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euclidean skeleton via centre-of-maximal-disc extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thinning algorithms have a clear advantage in terms of simplicity. However, their performance is not invariant under Euclidean transformation unless weighted distance functions are used to approximate the Euclidean distance or the Eu-clidean distance itself are used [3]. Curve evolution methods, on the other hand, are invariant under Euclidean transformation, but require a functional description of the boundary curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinning algorithms have a clear advantage in terms of simplicity. However, their performance is not invariant under Euclidean transformation unless weighted distance functions are used to approximate the Euclidean distance or the Eu-clidean distance itself are used [3]. Curve evolution methods, on the other hand, are invariant under Euclidean transformation, but require a functional description of the boundary curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]). d is the distance from the contour to the skeleton and Ψ(·) is a signed distance map from the contour C that surrounds the foreground region f. The signed distance map Ψ is a composite function, obtained by applying the signed distance transform D, (e.g.…”
Section: Shape Representation and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signed distance skeletonization process, S • Ψ, utilizes the signed distance map by first identifying the local minima in the signed distance map [1], i.e. X min = {x|Ψ(x) < Ψ(x i ) ∃x i : | x, x i | ≤ 1, Ψ(x) < 0}.…”
Section: Shape Representation and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The skeleton obtained in one inspection of the DT computed with w e =3 and w v =4 [13,14]. Also in this case, the skeleton is nearly-thin and the same final thinning already discussed can be employed to obtain the unit-wide skeleton.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%