2017
DOI: 10.1159/000479810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU Policy on Lung Cancer CT Screening 2017

Abstract: Background: Lung cancer kills more Europeans than any other cancer. In 2013, 269,000 citizens of the EU-28 died from this disease. Lung cancer CT screening has the potential to detect lung cancer at an early stage and improve mortality. All of the randomised controlled trials and cohort low-dose CT (LDCT) screening trials across the world have identified very early stage disease (∼70%); the majority of these LDCT trial patients were suitable for surgical interventions and had a good clinical outcome. The 10-ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, numerous factors must be taken into account to ensure that the benefit of screening will outweigh the risks of potential harms. European [29,38,39] and German [40] medical societies and expert panels have recommended that screening should be performed exclusively in context of a systematically organized and quality-assured program, regionally organized around expert oncological centers, similar to the key elements outlined above. The German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS) is currently performing a scientific evaluation of LDCT screening for the reduction of lung cancer mortality, including the systematic modalities required for it to be sufficiently safe and overall beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, numerous factors must be taken into account to ensure that the benefit of screening will outweigh the risks of potential harms. European [29,38,39] and German [40] medical societies and expert panels have recommended that screening should be performed exclusively in context of a systematically organized and quality-assured program, regionally organized around expert oncological centers, similar to the key elements outlined above. The German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS) is currently performing a scientific evaluation of LDCT screening for the reduction of lung cancer mortality, including the systematic modalities required for it to be sufficiently safe and overall beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk thresholds need to be periodically reassessed as the distribution of risk factors in a population may change over time and the utility of models may depend on either data availability or population traits. Moreover, the European Position Statement on Lung Cancer Screening [1] and the 2017 EU Policy Document on Lung Cancer Screening [43] emphasised that models should be able to identify individuals with sufficiently high risk to develop lung cancer in order to beneficially impact on the cost-effectiveness of LDCT-LCS. For example, LDCT-LCS is likely to be cost-ineffective in most cases of never-smokers [44], despite that lung cancer continues to remain one of the ten most frequent cancers in this demography group too.…”
Section: Selection Of High-risk Individuals For Ldct-lcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But multiple research challenges face biomarker development and validation in the context of lung cancer screening, where the interaction between genetics and external factors is multidimensional and hard to control. And so many biomarkers are approaching clinical validation that the field is in great need of standardised metrics of clinical utility – as it is across all cancer types [32, 34].…”
Section: Practical Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%