2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780203704103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU Induced Institutional Change in Post-Soviet Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…97-9). Nizhnikau (2018) highlights the importance of analysing domestic institutions and actors in the Eastern Partnership countries, and in particular the allocation of power, to understand resistance to EU-induced reforms. Similarly, Králiková (2022) shows with regard to Ukraine's anti-corruption reform that despite the successful legal change, the implementation suffers from attempts at delaying and manipulating the reform process as a result of its implications for certain domestic actors' entrenched interests and power positions.…”
Section: Implementation Of New Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…97-9). Nizhnikau (2018) highlights the importance of analysing domestic institutions and actors in the Eastern Partnership countries, and in particular the allocation of power, to understand resistance to EU-induced reforms. Similarly, Králiková (2022) shows with regard to Ukraine's anti-corruption reform that despite the successful legal change, the implementation suffers from attempts at delaying and manipulating the reform process as a result of its implications for certain domestic actors' entrenched interests and power positions.…”
Section: Implementation Of New Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%