2004
DOI: 10.3917/reof.075.0241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU enlargement: what does it change for the European economic geography?

Abstract: and Slovenia. We only deal with the CEECs including Bulgaria and Romania whose accession is postponed until 2007 or 2008, according to the latest declarations by EU officials. Because of data limitations, we restrict our sample of Mediterranean economies to five countries: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Huge disparities exist among the new EU members. The Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia and Poland are more diversified than such peripheral countries as Portugal and Greece, while the Balkan and Baltic countries exhibit the highest values for the specialization index (Dupuch et al , 2004).…”
Section: The Role Of Economic Integration and Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huge disparities exist among the new EU members. The Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia and Poland are more diversified than such peripheral countries as Portugal and Greece, while the Balkan and Baltic countries exhibit the highest values for the specialization index (Dupuch et al , 2004).…”
Section: The Role Of Economic Integration and Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since weak labour mobility (Tassinopoulos and Werner 1999), is relevant for Europe, the deepening of the European integration process should have induced an important redispersion of industrial activities. Yet, Dupuch et al. (2004) clearly highlight that the core‐periphery structureremains persistent in Europe despite some relocation of industrial activities toward CEECs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De plus, les firmes multinationales (FMN) peuvent avoir des retombées positives sur les éco-nomies d'accueil via les relations input-output avec les entreprises locales, la mobilité de la main-d'oeuvre et les effets d'imitation ou de concurrence. Enfin, le rôle moteur des IDE dans la transformation de ces économies ouvre sous certaines conditions des perspectives de rattrapage vis-à-vis de l'Union européenne (UE) (Dupuch et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified