EU Bio-Based Economy Strategy

Kardung, Maximilian; Wesseler, Justus

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_15

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, bioeconomy knowledge-based activities (e.g., in life sciences) are integrated into other bioeconomy initiatives. Notably, the bioeconomy concept first reached the EU policy agenda under the name of knowledge bio-based economy (KBBE) and the EU bioeconomy has mainly been supported by research and innovation policies ( Birner, 2018 ;Patermann and Aguilar, 2018 ;Kardung and Wesseler, 2019 ). The output of knowledge activities cannot be measured with a biomass content, but rather by determining the proportion of knowledge or knowhow created or disseminated in bioeconomy-related disciplines.…”

Section: Knowledge-based Services In the Field Of The Bioeconomymentioning

confidence: 99%

An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight

Ronzon

Iost

Philippidis

2022

Structural Change and Economic Dynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Knowledge-based Services In the Field Of The Bioeconomymentioning

confidence: 99%

An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight

Ronzon

Iost

Philippidis

2022

Structural Change and Economic Dynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many countries around the globe are now aspiring to transform the resource base of their economies from fossil to biological resources, moving towards a 'bioeconomy'. At least 49 countries have published bioeconomy strategies (Kardung & Wesseler, 2019). The core of bioeconomies are BBPS, i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience and policy design in the emerging bioeconomy – the RPD framework and the changing role of energy crop systems in Germany

Feindt

Proestou

Daedlow

2020

Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The resilience of social-ecological systems (SES) has become a major concern in environmental policy. The ongoing transition towards a bio-based economy essentially aims to address resilience challenges of the fossil-based economy. Its success depends on the resilience of the SES and bio-based production systems (BBPS) on which the bioeconomy rests. This paper introduces the Resilience Policy Design (RPD) framework to analyse and assess how bioeconomy policies address the resilience challenges of SES/BBPS. It combines resilience thinking and the 'new' policy design perspective, aiming at comparative research across countries, sectors and policy levels. It comprises five steps: determining relevant context conditions and the policy design space, characterizing bioeconomy policy mixes, identifying affected SES/BBPS and their resilience challenges, assessing the orientation of the policy mix towards different resilience capabilities (robustness, adaptability or transformability) and its resilience-enabling or-constraining elements, and overall assessment. An exemplary application focusing on energy maize in Germany finds a layered policy mix, addressing different resilience concerns over time. It demonstrates the inherently political nature of SES/BBPS resilience that requires inclusive, deliberative policy-making, the importance of policy feedback for adaptive and transformative governance with a long-term perspective, and the need for inter-/transdisciplinary collaboration to develop and assess resilience policies.

show abstract

“…The three biological resources included in this study are mostly analyzed jointly in many bioeconomy references [34,35]. On the other hand, the EU biobased economy strategy considers them to belong to the same kind of economic activity [36]. In addition to this, in the last two decades or so, extensive literature has proposed their optimal management by using different MCDM approaches.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Sustainable Management of Land and Fisheries Resources Using Multicriteria Techniques: A Meta-Analysis

Dı́az-Balteiro

Iglesias-Merchán

Romero

et al. 2020

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years modern societies have attached a multifunctional requirement to the use of renewable resources, making their optimal sustainable management more complex. In the last decades, in many cases, this complexity is addressed by formulating management models with the help of the concepts and methods belonging to the well-known multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) paradigm. The purpose of this paper was to undertake a hermeneutic meta-analysis of the literature provided in primary journals on issues related to the management of these resources with the help of the MCDM paradigm. In this way, the paper aimed to obtain new, basic insights with considerations that might improve the efficiency of future research in the field studied. The meta-analysis was implemented by formulating and testing a battery of hypotheses of how the MCDM methods have been used in the past for the formulation of management models for the type of resource analyzed.

show abstract

EU Bio-Based Economy Strategy

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight

An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight

Resilience and policy design in the emerging bioeconomy – the RPD framework and the changing role of energy crop systems in Germany

The Sustainable Management of Land and Fisheries Resources Using Multicriteria Techniques: A Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About