Étude pilote d’évaluation d’un programme d’accompagnement pour les patients quittant l’hôpital avec un PICC-line

Veyrier, Marc; Henry, C.; Decottignies, Audrey; Laouini, T.; Maître, Sophie; Bégué, Thierry; Rieutord, André; Barthier, S.; Roy, S.

doi:10.1016/j.pharma.2018.07.001

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have the advantage of reducing pain from repeated peripheral vein puncture, reducing the incidence of catheter-related complications and protecting veins. 1 – 3 PICCs are widely used in medium- and long-term intravenous infusion in chemotherapy patients. 4 , 5 Furthermore, PICC bedside placement is convenient for both patients and providers; 6 thus, the use of PICCs has grown steadily in recent decades in China.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of video-assisted education on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters: a randomized controlled trial

Huang

Luo

et al. 2020

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To evaluate the effects of a video-assisted education intervention on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects on informed consent of video-assisted patient education and traditional face-to-face discussion in a catheter outpatient ward of a cancer centre in Guangzhou, China, in 2018. Participants were 140 patients randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two groups: video-assisted or traditional intervention. General information, patient retention of PICC-related information, working time spent by nurses on the procedure, and patient and nurse satisfaction with the procedure were assessed. Results The time used for informed consent was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.02 ± 0.24 minutes) than in the control group (6.87 ± 1.10 minutes). The time used for PICC-related education was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.03 ± 0.28 minutes) than in the control group (5.11 ± 0.57 minutes). Nurses’ degree of satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in the experimental group (4.10 ± 0.57) than in the control group (2.60 ± 0.70). Conclusion The use of video-assisted informed consent and patient education in this cancer centre decreased nurses’ working time and improved nurses’ satisfaction. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015664

show abstract