Étude de reproductibilité de la cotation du « Bilan 400 points », une mesure de capacité fonctionnelle de la main

Gable, C.; Kandel, M.; Moureau, F.; Beer, L.; Chau, N; Paysant, Jean

doi:10.1016/j.main.2012.01.008

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gable [24], with 85 patients, found an ICC ranging from 0.90 to 0.97, depending on the specialization of the different evaluators (physiotherapists, occupational therapists). In a second study [32], the same group found an ICC superior to 0.95. Naranjo-Olguin in the Spanish version of the 400point HA [31] found an inter-rater correlation of 0.98.…”

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Only test 1(mobility) had an ICC < 0.8. Gable [32], with 30 patients, also found an ICC > 0.90 for the total score of the original 400-point HA carried out twice the same day by three evaluators. Naranjo-Olguin for the Spanish version of the 400-point HA [31] found an intra-rater correlation of 0.99.…”

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 87%

“…The number of patients for T1 and T2 was estimated at 40 patients in each group. Because no international recommendations are available, this number was chosen based on previous studies about the original 400-point HA [31,32] and on other studies of functional hand tests [18,20,22]. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the original version of the 400-point HA was good with 20 to 30 patients, so we expected the same result with 40 patients in each group.…”

Section: Intra-and Inter-rater Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Generally, test n°4 is the most difficult to quote because of the complexity of the activities which requires both hands. Good experience of the evaluators is necessary for the judgement [32]. In our study, 16 couples of very seasoned occupational therapists (OT) were involved in the inter-rater reliability.…”

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After removal of some redundant items, the final version of the 400-point HA was published in 1996 [26,27]. The inter-rater and the test retest reliability were studied and found to be good [24,31,32], with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of more than 0.95 and 0.82, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Prospective multicentre validation study of a new standardised version of the 400-point hand assessment

Konzelmann

Burrus

Gable

et al. 2020

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hand rehabilitation needs valid evaluation tools; the 400-point Hand Assessment (HA) is an exhaustive but not standardised tool. The aim of this study was to validate a standardised version of this test. Methods: A modified version and a standardised prototype was made for this prospective validation study (four centres, three countries). Psychometric properties studied: reliability (intra-rater and inter-rater, standard error of measurement [SEM], minimum detectable change [MDC],internal consistency); content validity, construct validity with Jebsen Taylor hand function test, QuickDASH, MOS-SF 36 and pain; responsiveness, using an anchor-based approach (ROC curve with area under curve, mean response change) with calculation of MCID. For SEM, MDC and responsiveness, QuickDASH was used for comparison. Results: One hundred and seventy-six patients with hand/wrist injuries were included between May 2013 and February 2015. One hundred and seventy were available for final analysis: 67% men; mean age 43.4 ± 13.2 years; both manual and office workers (46, 5% of each); 37% had a hand or wrist fracture.

show abstract

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Intra-and Inter-rater Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Prospective multicentre validation study of a new standardised version of the 400-point hand assessment

Konzelmann

Burrus

Gable

et al. 2020

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Predictive factors for the duration until return to work after surgery for work‐related rotator cuff syndrome: A prospective study of 92 workers

Pichene-Houard

Paysant

Claudon

et al. 2021

American J Industrial Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Return to work (RTW) after surgery for a work‐related rotator cuff disorder (WRRCD) is often difficult. The study's purpose was to identify preoperative factors predicting RTW. Methods Ninety‐two workers with a WRRCD were identified by four surgeons. Before surgery, the workers completed a series of standardized questionnaires related to working conditions, health, and health beliefs. They were followed up prospectively for 20 months. Statistical analysis was based on single and multiple‐factor Cox models of the duration of absence from the time of surgery until RTW. Results The median age at inclusion was 49 years (27–62), with 52 women included (57%). Sixty‐one subjects (66%) were employed in highly physically demanding jobs. Forty‐two (46%) stayed at work until their surgery, whereas preoperative sick leave exceeded 100 days in 20 subjects (21%). Twenty months after surgery, 14 were still not back at work. For the other participants, the mean duration until RTW was 225 days (SD 156). In the fully adjusted model, variables that were significantly predictive of the duration until RTW were: work physical demand levels, preoperative sick leave, the number of body parts causing pain or discomfort in the last 12 months, self‐assessed 2‐year workability, and the Readiness for RTW (RRTW) Scale. Conclusions Several physical, psychological, and work‐related factors, easily recorded, can be identified preoperatively. They may be predictive of delayed return, loss of employment, or employability as a result of shoulder surgery.

show abstract

Predictive factors of return‐to‐work trajectory after work‐related rotator cuff syndrome: A prospective study of 96 workers

Pichene-Houard

Sirveaux

Clerc‐Urmès

et al. 2023

American J Industrial Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Sustained return to work after surgery for work-related rotator cuff syndrome (WRRCS) remains quite difficult. The main purpose of the present study was to identify predictive factors of a return-to-work (RTW) trajectory.Methods: A total of 96 workers with WRRCS were identified by 4 surgeons. They were followed prospectively before and after the surgery, until 1 year after RTW, or for 20 months after surgery when they did not. Participants completed a series of standardized questionnaires related to working conditions, health, and beliefs, and performed functional tests at the inclusion time. During the follow-up period, they were regularly asked about their working conditions (present or not at work), activity (normal or lightened physical duties) and schedules (full-or part-time job). Statistical analysis was based on single-and multiple-factor models of prediction of the workers' trajectory.Results: Three trajectories of RTW were distinguished, considering RTW and absenteeism that occurred during the follow-up: stable, unstable, and non-RTW. The median age of the sample was 49.5 [45.0-54.0], with 67.7% of workers employed in highly physically demanding jobs. In the multiple factor model, three factors were highly predictive of the trajectory: perceived health before surgery, having had a repaired ruptured-rotator-cuff tendinopathy, and the level of physical demand of the job. Conclusion:Three easy-to-collect predictive factors of RTW trajectory have been identified. They may be useful for healthcare professionals and care givers to identify vulnerable workers' risk of occupational dropout after arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

show abstract

Étude de reproductibilité de la cotation du « Bilan 400 points », une mesure de capacité fonctionnelle de la main

Cited by 11 publications

References 6 publications

Prospective multicentre validation study of a new standardised version of the 400-point hand assessment

Prospective multicentre validation study of a new standardised version of the 400-point hand assessment

Predictive factors for the duration until return to work after surgery for work‐related rotator cuff syndrome: A prospective study of 92 workers

Predictive factors of return‐to‐work trajectory after work‐related rotator cuff syndrome: A prospective study of 96 workers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About