2003
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ETOPE: evolutionary test of predicted exons

Abstract: Since a large number of computationally predicted exons are not supported by existing sequence (e.g. ESTs) or experimental (e.g. expression analysis) data they need to be validated by other methods. ETOPE is designed to test computational predictions by using signals that have not been included in any current computational prediction method. The test is based on the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rates between sequences from different genomes. It has been previously shown, by empirical data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We computed the Ks rate and Ka͞Ks ratio between orthologous exon pairs following the approach of Li and colleagues (30). Briefly, orthologous exon sequences from human and mouse were translated in all possible reading frames.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We computed the Ks rate and Ka͞Ks ratio between orthologous exon pairs following the approach of Li and colleagues (30). Briefly, orthologous exon sequences from human and mouse were translated in all possible reading frames.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low dN/dS ratio indicates negative selection, which was found to be a reliable way to detect coding regions in pairwise (Nekrutenko et al 2003) and multiple alignments (Lin et al 2008). The structure of the genetic code leads to a periodic pattern of evolutionary rates (Bofkin and Goldman 2007), another characteristic of protein-coding regions that was applied, for example, to assess the coding potential of unannotated transcripts in S. cerevisiae (David et al 2006) and in human in the ENCODE pilot project (The ENCODE Project Consortium 2007).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Comparative Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various algorithms have been developed to predict coding potential in pairwise alignments (Badger and Olsen 1999;Rivas and Eddy 2001;Mignone et al 2003;Nekrutenko et al 2003), and the power of multi-species comparison for the purpose of coding region prediction was demonstrated impressively in yeast (Kellis et al 2003), human (Clamp et al 2007), and more recently in 12 drosophilid genomes (Stark et al 2007;Lin et al 2008). There is no doubt that these types of analysis are powerful and useful additions to classical gene finders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a previously described approach [4,10], the protein alignment generated to identify orthologous exons was used to realign the two nucleotide sequences of each orthologous exon pair. Gaps were removed.…”
Section: Calculation Of Synonymous and Non-synonymous Mutation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%