2023
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13081456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ETISTP: An Enhanced Model for Brain Tumor Identification and Survival Time Prediction

Abstract: Technology-assisted diagnosis is increasingly important in healthcare systems. Brain tumors are a leading cause of death worldwide, and treatment plans rely heavily on accurate survival predictions. Gliomas, a type of brain tumor, have particularly high mortality rates and can be further classified as low- or high-grade, making survival prediction challenging. Existing literature provides several survival prediction models that use different parameters, such as patient age, gross total resection status, tumor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2023, Hussain et al 37 had implemented a enhanced BT identification and survival time prediction (EBTISTP), it calculates the volume of tumor, divides it into high or low‐grade glioma, which provides the overall survival (OS) period. The only drawback was dependence on high‐quality MRIs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2023, Hussain et al 37 had implemented a enhanced BT identification and survival time prediction (EBTISTP), it calculates the volume of tumor, divides it into high or low‐grade glioma, which provides the overall survival (OS) period. The only drawback was dependence on high‐quality MRIs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hussain et al [5] proposed a model to predict the survival time of patients with brain tumors. This model was the first model to consider the volume of brain tumor in survival time calculation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although brain MRIs inherently capture 3D data, a notable observation is that over 80% of the studies conducted their analyses within a 2D domain, focusing on 2D MRI slices. Nonetheless, some investigations have actively explored the significance of incorporating 3D volumetric information into the realm of brain tumor classification [56,58,59,74,97,98,100,112,117,[129][130][131][132]135,[140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148]. Although 3D volumes inherently capture information from the three anatomical planes, 2D slices are restricted to a specific view.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further enhance the classification performance, they incorporated information from each source using an aggregation layer within the network architecture. Subsequently, similar ensemble learning approaches were adopted by Gutta et al [106], Hussain et al [148], Rui et al [149]. Notably, Guo et al [150] directly compared the performance of a modality-fusion approach, where the four MRI modalities were concatenated as a four-channel input, with a decision-fusion approach, where final predictions were derived through a linear weighted sum from the probabilities obtained through four independent pre-trained unimodal models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%