2000
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200008000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etiology of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Current Trends in Research*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
174
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
174
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The general incidence of AIS has been reported to range from 2 to 4% [1][2][3][4]. Among the different causes suggested in the literature [5,6], abnormal skeletal growth in AIS has been shown to associate with the development and progression of scoliotic curves [7,8]. In our previous study [9], AIS girls were found to be significantly taller and leaner, and had longer arm span similar to other reports [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The general incidence of AIS has been reported to range from 2 to 4% [1][2][3][4]. Among the different causes suggested in the literature [5,6], abnormal skeletal growth in AIS has been shown to associate with the development and progression of scoliotic curves [7,8]. In our previous study [9], AIS girls were found to be significantly taller and leaner, and had longer arm span similar to other reports [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Another prerequisite for the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the presence of an adolescent growth spurt (Lowe et al, 2000;Cheung et al, 2008), but it is disputed whether Homo erectus already evolved this distinctive human growth pattern (Smith, 1993;Tardieu, 1998;Smith, 2004;Zihlman et al, 2004;Graves et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proprioceptive systems, biomechanical factors, uncoupled neuro-osseous growth and dissociation between the timing of skeletal and CNS maturation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. There is considerable difficulty in distinguishing the primary underlying pathogenetic factor(s) that cause deformity from the secondary changes that arise secondary to the deformity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%