Ethos in Sports: An Aristotelian Examination Focused on Source Credibility and the Modern Day Athlete

Abstract

The current study analyzed source credibility in a sports related context. A review of previous literature was undertaken in order to highlight the central findings focused on the dimensions of competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness. Quantitative methods were then utilized as a means to empirically test whether unconfirmed reports of performance-enhancing drug use could negatively impact perceptions of athlete ethos. Findings revealed that athletes who were inconclusively linked to performance-enhancers were evaluated less favorably in terms of their overall competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness. The implications from this study indicate that clean athletes who are wrongfully accused should proactively communicate their innocence to the general public. Athletes who are not clean should employ various face and image restoration strategies in order to effectively manage their public credibility. Study limitations and directions for future research were appropriately addressed within the present scholarship.

Communicating Compassionately in a Crisis: John Curtin and Journalists, 1941-1945

“…Contemporary researchers have theorized that the notion of ethos extends to an audience"s perceptions of a speaker"s credibility. Communication researchers have drawn upon the Aristotelian traits of arete, phronesis and eunoia for ascertaining a speaker"s ethos (Dix, 2015;Marsh, 2006). A speaker"s persona needs to manifest these components to be persuasive: "There are three things which inspire confidence in the orator"s own characterthe three, namely, that induce us to believe a thing apart from any proof of it: good sense, good moral character, and goodwill" (Aristotle, cited 2010, p. 60).…”