Ethnography, space and politics: interrogating the process of protest in the Tibetan Freedom Movement

Abstract

This paper examines the ability of ethnographic research methods to effectively study spatially extensive political activity. It argues that traditional ethnographic methods of sustained engagement with spatially bounded sites are not adequately suited to dealing with contemporary spatially extensive political movements. It argues that contemporary attempts to bridge this impasse have emphasised a dichotomy between global and local that ignores the connections, disconnections and process that occur between places. The paper argues for a critical ethnography that is based on a relational understanding of space emphasising Gillian Hart's conception of the interconnected nature of the 'site'. Taking a single demonstration against the Beijing 2008 Olympics conducted by UK-based Tibet supporters, it examines how the site of protest was closely linked to a variety of other places. Interrogating the processes of connection and disconnection brought about through the protest creates an ethnographic account that, while partial, develops an engagement with the heterogeneity of contemporary political action.

Considering nationality and performativity: undertaking research across the geopolitical divide in the Falkland Islands and Argentina

“…For instance, where research is being carried out with and across ‘divided’ communities, as was very explicitly the case with my research in Argentina and the Falkland Islands, it is vital that researchers think through the implications of their encounters with respondents. What challenges does such multi‐sited research generate (Davies ) and how might things like researcher positionality need to be (re)considered if respondents are aware that the research project will be listening to citizens and (counter‐)arguments elsewhere (Herod )?…”

On the Potential of Being a Village Boy: An Argument for Local Rural Ethnography

“…Positing subjectivity as an inescapable and vital aspect of the research process, this school of thought has effectively destabilised the epistemological and methodological justifications for detachment in the field. This has resulted in a movement to close the gap between researcher and researched (Coffey 1999; Davies 2009).…”

“…The starting point for much of this discussion has been the acknowledgement that these categories, including ‘insider/outsider’, ‘native/alien’ and their many variants are themselves ideal types that, in practice, are both fluid and dynamic. In particular, insider/outsider status should not be seen to rest on a single axis of differentiation, as social actors are characterised by multiple identities (Davies 2009; Joseph 2009). This has prompted many researchers to reflect upon the interaction of their plural identities with the plural, potentially fluid identities of those being researched (Halstead 2001, p. 228; Crang 2005).…”

Resistance, Space and Political Identities: The Making of Counter-Global Networks

“…This approach, as Caroline Bressey has argued, enables networks 'to be established between places and people as opposed to a divisive focus upon difference' (Bressey, 2009, p. 914). This involved experimentation with methods which are alive to the processual character of translocal practices, in both past and present (see, for more explicit discussion, Davies, 2008;Featherstone, 2009).…”