Abstract.Nationalism theory has long acknowledged that in its relation to nationalism, 'religion' can refer both to a reflexive identity attached to a people group, and to an articulated and reasoned valuebased position. Even this bifurcation remains insufficiently precise. Religio-nationalisms reasoned ex patria -that is, beginning with the nationalist and proceeding from there to incorporate religion -tend towards values of exclusivity, division, and animosity to 'the other'. They have been charged with 'hijacking' religion as an identity whilst being at odds with members and leaders of that religion's practicing community. The exploratory case of the relationship between Russian Orthodoxy and Russian nationalism allows a comparison of ex patria religio-nationalism with its ex religio counterpart. It confirms to a large extent the hypothesis that reasoned religio-nationalism that begins with the religious and proceeds to the nationalist favors in contrast less antagonistic emphases such as inclusivity and benevolence.'Western democracies are experiencing a new wave of right-wing populism that seeks to mobilise religion for its own ends'. So claimed the publisher's description of a 2016 book, Saving the People, edited by Nadia Marzouki, Duncan McDonnell, and Olivier Roy. If religious identity can be -to use the verb found in that book's sub-title-'hijacked' by groups for whom it serves primarily as a marker of national identity, what does this mean for analysis of the relationship between religion and nationalism? If we accept that some right-wing populists 'hijack religion' to bolster their nationalist movements despite the objections of the religion's leaders and many practicing adherents, then what do we count as 'religion' when analysing such cases? Without further delineation the category 'religion' in relation to nationalism diminishes in analytical precision and utility.Analyzing existing theoretical literature, we can generalize that the relationship between religion and nationalism has both a reflexive-or instinctual-aspect, stemming from long-standing popular overlap of a people and their faith, and a reasoned-or intellectual-aspect developed by theologians, nationalists, and others as a worked-out justification for the connection between nation and religion. Using Russia and Russian Orthodoxy as an exploratory case, this article theorizes that within reasoned justifications of the relationship between religion and nationalism, differentiation can further be made between ex patria reasoning that begins with the national and proceeds to the religious, and ex religio reasoning that begins with the religious and proceeds to the national. It is further hypothesized that ex patria reasoning tends towards a more axiologically divisive stance than ex religio reasoning.
Reflexive and Reasoned Religio-NationalismAnthony D. Smith has argued that a full understanding of nationalism requires engagement with those 'sacred sources' that pre-date the modern state and are formative of a nation (2003, 255).The definit...