2020
DOI: 10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i4a.11661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnobotanical study of plants used as antimalarial in traditional medicine in Bagira in Eastern RD Congo

Abstract: This transversal descriptive study was carried out to collect plants and recipes used in Bagira to treat malaria. Direct interview with field enquiries allowed collecting ethnobotanical data. Eighty-four Informants (age 46.9 ± 12.0 years, sex ratio: 2.0, experience 12.1 ± 5.1 years) reported 53 species belonging to 24 families dominated by Fabaceae (22.6%) and Asteraceae (20.7%). Antiplasmodial activity was previously reported for 34 plants and 16 species are first cited as antimalarial plants among which Ekeb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows different locations where 24 Ethnopharmacological/Ethnobotanical/Ethnomedicinal studies were conducted on the DRC map. The studies were done in Kisangani (R1) by Katemo et al (2012) , Mpiana et al (2015) ; in Beni and Lubero (R2) by ( Kasika et al, 2015 ); in Bukavu (R3) by ( Karhagomba et al, 2013 ; Kasali et al, 2013 , 2021 ; Chiribagula et al, 2020 ; Manya et al, 2020 ); in Mbandaka, Bagdolite, and Kungu (R4) by ( Mongeke et al, 2018 ) ; in Lubumbashi, Kafubu, Kasumbalesa, Kipushi, Likasi and Sambwa (R5) by ( Muya et al, 2014 ; Mbayo et al, 2016 ; Amuri et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Bashige-Chiribagula et al, 2017 ; Mbuyi et al, 2019 ; Valentin et al, 2020 ) ( Amuri et al, 2017 ); in Kinshasa, Kwango and Kongo central (R6) by ( Ngbolua et al, 2016a , 2016b , 2019 ; Latham and Mbuta, 2017 ; Masunda et al, 2019 ; Pathy et al, 2021 ); in non-specified sites (R7) by ( Moswa et al, 2005 ; Manzo, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows different locations where 24 Ethnopharmacological/Ethnobotanical/Ethnomedicinal studies were conducted on the DRC map. The studies were done in Kisangani (R1) by Katemo et al (2012) , Mpiana et al (2015) ; in Beni and Lubero (R2) by ( Kasika et al, 2015 ); in Bukavu (R3) by ( Karhagomba et al, 2013 ; Kasali et al, 2013 , 2021 ; Chiribagula et al, 2020 ; Manya et al, 2020 ); in Mbandaka, Bagdolite, and Kungu (R4) by ( Mongeke et al, 2018 ) ; in Lubumbashi, Kafubu, Kasumbalesa, Kipushi, Likasi and Sambwa (R5) by ( Muya et al, 2014 ; Mbayo et al, 2016 ; Amuri et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Bashige-Chiribagula et al, 2017 ; Mbuyi et al, 2019 ; Valentin et al, 2020 ) ( Amuri et al, 2017 ); in Kinshasa, Kwango and Kongo central (R6) by ( Ngbolua et al, 2016a , 2016b , 2019 ; Latham and Mbuta, 2017 ; Masunda et al, 2019 ; Pathy et al, 2021 ); in non-specified sites (R7) by ( Moswa et al, 2005 ; Manzo, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis is a mixed idea, especially since this extraction procedure is more benefcial than harmful. Indeed, as much as it could facilitate the release of certain active principles often present in the plant in the form of glucosides, it could not only release specifc toxic secondary metabolites such as cyanogenic glycosides [122] but also deteriorate the active ingredient when the latter is thermolabile [123][124][125]. Terefore, this practice remains to be assessed case-by-case, and only experimental work could determine its fair value.…”
Section: LVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is great potential for plant extract-based treatments, as shown in ethnobotanical research conducted in DRCongo [29,30], e.g., in Kinshasa and Kasangulu [30,31,32], and in North and South Kivu [33,34,35]. These studies have identi ed numerous medicinal plant species from families such as Euphorbiaceae, Rubiaceae, Papilionaceae, Malvaceae, Lamiaceae, Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Caricaceae, Poaceae and Myrtaceae that are effective in controlling infectious diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%