Ethno-medicinal uses of vertebrates in Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape, central Nepal

Abstract

Background: Traditional knowledge on use of animal products to maintain human health is important since time immemorial. Although a few studies are reported as food and medicinal values of different animals, a comprehensive ethno-medicinal study of vertebrates in Nepal is still lacking. Thus, present study is aimed to document the ethno-medicinal knowledge related to vertebrate fauna among different ethnic communities in Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape, central Nepal.Methods: Ethno-medicinal information collected by using semi-structured questionnaires, focus group discussion and key informant interview. The data were analyzed by applying Use Value (UV), Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) and Fidelity level (FL).Results: The study reported a total of 58 species of vertebrates of which 53 were wild and 5 as domestic. They were used to treat 62 different types human ailments. Four vertebrates were also used for veterinary and agriculture. The most commonly used species was Felis chaus (UV = 0.25) with 3 use-reports by 10 informants. Cardiovascular and dental problems had the highest ICF value (0.974) with cardiovascular problems having 351 use-reports for 10 animal species and dental problems having 77 use-reports for 3 animal species. The least ICF was found in ophthalmological problems (ICF=0.833, use reports=7 for 2 species). Conclusions: The vertebrates are widely used by the local people and the traditional healers in Chitwan-Annapurna landscape against various ailments. The users collected the vertebrates mostly from wild. People intentionally or unintentionally kill wild animals that has threated the availability of different species. Our study revealed in-depth knowledge on use of vertebrates including their status needed for the sustainable ethno-medicinal uses and their future conservation.

Ethnozoological uses of wildlife species among the Iraqw people of Mbulu District, Northern Tanzania

“…Our results revealed that modern health facilities such as hospitals and pharmaceuticals have replaced the use of zootherapy and, therefore, hindered the transmission of ethnozoological knowledge from one generation to another. Similar ndings have been reported by other studies conducted in Serengeti (23) and in Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape, central Nepal [33]. Such development can contribute signi cantly to species conservation due to minimal dependence on wild animals for zootherapy, particularly when the medications involve killing of animals.…”