1995
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.104.3.464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnicity and gender in scales of psychosis proneness and mood disorders.

Abstract: Data for Caucasian, African American, Asian American, and Latino college-student samples were compared for several popular self-report scales of psychopathology. Significant group differences were obtained for all scales, with the Caucasian sample consistently having the lowest means. Some gender effects and interactions with ethnic group were also observed. The authors discuss implications of these findings for use of these scales, including implications for use of Caucasian norms with other ethnic samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
50
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(63 reference statements)
11
50
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While gender differences in multiple schizotypy domains were expected, the isolated finding pertaining to social anhedonia was consistent with previous research demonstrating that males score higher on scales reflecting social anhedonia (Chapman et al, 1976;Chmielewski et al, 1995;Claridge et al, 1996;Kwapil et al, 2008;Muntaner et al, 1988). The relationship between race/ethnicity and PAS scores was consistent with some prior research, while the association between race/ethnicity and RSAS scores was contradictory (Chmielewski et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While gender differences in multiple schizotypy domains were expected, the isolated finding pertaining to social anhedonia was consistent with previous research demonstrating that males score higher on scales reflecting social anhedonia (Chapman et al, 1976;Chmielewski et al, 1995;Claridge et al, 1996;Kwapil et al, 2008;Muntaner et al, 1988). The relationship between race/ethnicity and PAS scores was consistent with some prior research, while the association between race/ethnicity and RSAS scores was contradictory (Chmielewski et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Schizotypal domains appear to manifest consistently across racial/ethnic groups (Chmielewski et al, 1995). Associations between higher levels of schizotypy and fewer social supports, poorer overall social adjustment, lower rates of dating or marriage, and lower quality of intimate relationships have been reported (Horan et al, 2007;Kwapil et al, 2008;Mishlove and Chapman, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mean scores obtained by the participants on the four scales of psychosis proneness, PerAb (M=4.98, SD=5.57), MagId (M = 8.05, SD = 5.40), PhyAn (M = 10.41, SD=6.19), and SocAn (M=6.78, SD=5.07), were similar to each other in range and distribution and similar to scores obtained in a very large undergraduate sample (Chmielewski et al, 1995). The emotion interference manipulation was successful: emotional words were associated with delayed responses, with both positive words and negative words reliably showing interference (positive interference mean=9 ms, SD=42 ms, t(159)=2.63, p=.009; negative interference mean=19 ms, SD=49 ms, t(159) =4.84, p<.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This selection method has been established in previous studies. 9,11,21 Prior research 76 has shown significant racial group differences on the SocAnh Scale, with Caucasians having the lowest mean scores, as well as significant gender differences, with men scoring higher than women. Thus, SD cut-offs were determined separately for each gender and Caucasian vs other racial groups (other racial groups were collapsed into 1 minority category as some racial groups were too small to conduct individual analyses).…”
Section: Participant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%