“…Also, there were no racial differences in the number of APPS-distress endorsed Racial discrimination was associated with APPS-distress and remained significant after adjusting for age (β = .105, p < .001). Bootstrapping analyses suggested that the relationship between racial discrimination and APPS-distress was partially mediated by RS-scores (Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire-Race; participants concerns and expectations of rejection based on their race) Anglin et al (2016), USA a [39] At least 70% of the student sample experienced one type of perceived discrimination, and a positive significant relationship between perceived discrimination and positive psychotic symptoms (r = 0.211, p < 0.001) Additionally, the relationship between discrimination and positive psychotic symptoms differed based on participant's commitment and exploration of their ethnicity, i.e., ethnic identity (e.g., low ethnic identity, moderate ethnic identity and high ethnic identity Perceived ethnic discrimination was significantly higher in the UHR group compared to health controls, t = 3.63, p < 0.001 Positive correlation between perceived ethnic discrimination and persecutory paranoia in virtual reality for the whole sample (r = 0.25, p = 0.009), but not in individuals at UHR risk (r = 0.119, p = 0.360), or healthy controls (r = 0.212, p = 0.180). Logistic regression found that perceived discrimination was not a significant predictor of paranoid ideation in virtual reality for the whole sample (p = 0.25) or the UHR group (p = 0.95).…”