1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00037.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic, Gender, and Age Preferences among Deaf and Hearing Preschool Peers

Abstract: The present study concerns ethnic, age, and gender playmate preferences of deaf and hearing preschoolers who were observed during outdoor free play at their respective schools over a 7-month period. Hispanic, black, and white children were included. It was hypothesized that peer preferences would be less apparent among deaf children than among hearing children if these preferences were based on (a) language differences between ethnic groups (e.g., Spanish-English differences), age groups (e.g., verbal fluency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These co-variates were selected in order to statistically control for the differences in child characteristics within and between groups. Although the children who were D/HH differed in degree of hearing loss, the significant variable affecting peer social behavior is not the degree of hearing loss itself, but the child's social maturity, communicative competence, and age (Guralnick, 1992;Lederberg, Chapin, Rosenblatt, & Vandell, 1986;Levine & Antia, in press). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These co-variates were selected in order to statistically control for the differences in child characteristics within and between groups. Although the children who were D/HH differed in degree of hearing loss, the significant variable affecting peer social behavior is not the degree of hearing loss itself, but the child's social maturity, communicative competence, and age (Guralnick, 1992;Lederberg, Chapin, Rosenblatt, & Vandell, 1986;Levine & Antia, in press). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In two separate studies Lederberg, Ryan, and Robbins (1986) and Lederberg, Chapin, Rosenblatt, and Vandell (1986) found that only 5% -7% of the interaction between D/HH children was linguistic. Levy-Shiff and Hoffman (1985) found that preschoolers who were D/HH engaged in significantly less conversation than hearing peers, while Antia and Kreimeyer (1987), Kreimeyer and Antia (1988) and Antia et al (1994) have consistently reported that children who are D/HH engaged in non-linguistic interaction more frequently than linguistic interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%