1999
DOI: 10.2307/3005571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic Enclaves and Intolerance: The Case of Yugoslavia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Being the minority, acceptance of more liberal (and not an ethnic-centered party) and believe in the freedom of speech proved that the Indian is less ethnic-centred and adopt the more liberal approach. This result is identical with the previous study that the minority tends to be more tolerant as opposite to majority (Bettelheim and Morris, 1949;Massey et al, 1999;Ahmad et al, 2013). It also witnessed that the Malays in Johor Bahru are reluctant to accept liberal political party and believed in controlled freedom of speech due to its lowest score of mean.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Being the minority, acceptance of more liberal (and not an ethnic-centered party) and believe in the freedom of speech proved that the Indian is less ethnic-centred and adopt the more liberal approach. This result is identical with the previous study that the minority tends to be more tolerant as opposite to majority (Bettelheim and Morris, 1949;Massey et al, 1999;Ahmad et al, 2013). It also witnessed that the Malays in Johor Bahru are reluctant to accept liberal political party and believed in controlled freedom of speech due to its lowest score of mean.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Being minority apart from Malays and Chinese, in line with the previous literature of minority-majority tolerance (Bettelheim and Morris, 1949;Massey et al, 1999;Ahmad et al, 2013) this result is considered opposite with previous literature. However, this situation may be referred to the leadership crisis in contemporary Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC), where it may possibly translate to diminishing grass root support for MIC among Indian ethnic in Johor Bahru from a civic participation perspectives.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Basically, as used here for racial/ ethnic groups, diversity is equivalent to the idea of heterogeneity as often more broadly invoked in sociology (e.g., Blau 1977;Blau and Schwartz 1984;Laumann 1973). All else equal, we expect greater diversity to lead to increased multiracial reporting because increased diversity (or heterogeneity, more broadly) tends to promote more frequent intergroup associations and greater tolerance, results often noted in the sociological literature (Allport 1954;Blalock 1967;Blau 1977;Massey, Hodson, and Sekulic 1999). In fact, it is precisely the lack of racial/ethnic tolerance in the Deep South that has tended to constrain the reporting of multiracial mixing, as noted above.…”
Section: The Geography Of Multiracial Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The contact hypothesis indirectly implies an increasing effect of segregation on the likelihood of intergroup conflicts. Supportive findings in empirical research showed highest intolerance and most competitive intergroup attitudes in homogenous ethnic enclaves (Anderson 1983;Denitch 1994;Massey et al 1999). Although contact across group borders seems to be the key to the reduction of intergroup conflict, it works only conditional on the quality, frequency, and extensiveness of the contact and on the context in which it takes place Miller 1984, 1996: 132;Brewer 1996aBrewer , 1996bBrewer , 1999.…”
Section: Structural Embeddedness Of Actionsmentioning
confidence: 85%