2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-016-0618-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic diversity and well-being

Abstract: This paper investigates how ethnic diversity, measured by immigrants' nationalities, influences the well-being of the host country. Using panel data from Germany from 1998 to 2012, we find a positive effect of ethnic diversity on the well-being of German natives. Our finding is robust to alternative definitions of ethnic diversity and to the non-random selection of natives and immigrants into regions. The positive effect of ethnic diversity is stronger for immigrant groups that are culturally and economically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(76 reference statements)
6
57
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 They use data from these 26 countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, satisfaction from living in areas with more immigrants in Germany. On a similar topic, Akay et al (2017) find that ethnic diversity is also associated with higher life satisfaction in Germany.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…7 They use data from these 26 countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, satisfaction from living in areas with more immigrants in Germany. On a similar topic, Akay et al (2017) find that ethnic diversity is also associated with higher life satisfaction in Germany.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Subjective well-being evaluations can estimate the overall outcome of immigration for the host country's natives, as natives' life evaluations implicitly capture and weigh the various costs and benefits of migration. Most initial evidence suggests that immigration and the related ethnic and cultural diversity generally have a positive though marginal impact on the well-being of the native population in various European countries (e.g., Akay, Constant, Giulietti, & Guzi, 2017), but this may not hold in every context or for more local communities (Longhi, 2014). Another stakeholder group for whom happiness has remained unstudied but that deserves attention is the broad population of the sending society; that is, equivalent to the notion of a brain gain/drain, the existence of a "happiness gain/drain" merits exploration.…”
Section: The Happiness Of Internal Migrants Natives and Stayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the BHPS follows the same people over time, we can estimate fixed effects regression models that take account of the potentially confounding impact of time-invariant individual characteristics. Our paper contributes to the nascent literature on the effects of immigration and diversity on the subjective well-being of native populations (Betz and Simpson, 2013;Longhi, 2014;Akay at al., 2014;Akay et al, 2017), the detailed review of which we provide in the next section, as well as to the broader, rapidly growing literature on subjective well-being and migration. 6 We also add to the literature studying the relative importance of individual and 6 See Simpson (2013) for an overview, Ivlevs (2015) for a review of the effects of subjective well-being on the emigration decision, Nikolova and Graham (2015) for a review of the effects of international migration on regional variation in subjective well-being, as well as the regional and local-level determinants of it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study adopts a methodology similar to Akay et al (2014) and Akay et al (2017), although we exploit a more disaggregated spatial variation in immigration rates (320 local authority districts of England and Wales) and concentrate on the effects on life satisfaction of a specific migration wave (A8 migration). We hypothesise that the A8 immigration may have affected the subjective well-being of UK residents through a number of channels: by increasing concerns about labour market competition and provision of public services (note that, even in the absence of real effects, people may still think immigration is harmful) and disrupting local ways of life through increased diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%