2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00651.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic Differences in Positive Alcohol Expectancies During Childhood: The Pittsburgh Girls Study

Abstract: Background-Positive expectancies about alcohol's effects are more likely to be endorsed with increasing age through adolescence, and the strength of positive alcohol expectancies in children appears to differ by ethnicity. Little is known about the extent to which differences in a measure's psychometric properties as a function of development and ethnicity may account for changes that are observed over time and ethnic differences. This study used measurement invariance methods to examine ethnic differences in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary multiple group analyses, which formally tested invariance of latent class structure for White and Black girls, indicated the need for separate analyses by race, which is consistent with prior PGS analyses of substance use data (Chung et al, 2008; Chung et al, in press). Sample weights, which approximate regional demographics according to the 2000 Census, were included in all RM LCA models.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Preliminary multiple group analyses, which formally tested invariance of latent class structure for White and Black girls, indicated the need for separate analyses by race, which is consistent with prior PGS analyses of substance use data (Chung et al, 2008; Chung et al, in press). Sample weights, which approximate regional demographics according to the 2000 Census, were included in all RM LCA models.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Among White girls, the early prospective association between conduct problems and alcohol use may be interpreted in terms of the acquired preparedness model (Anderson et al, 2003), which proposes that parental infl uences (i.e., caretaker antisocial behavior) and trait disinhibition (e.g., manifest as conduct problems) infl uence the formation of alcohol expectancies, which, in turn, infl uence alcohol use. Although this study did not examine alcohol expectancies, results from this study and other analyses of PGS data (Chung et al, 2008) suggest that, among White girls, those with externalizing behaviors are at risk for early alcohol use and may benefi t from early intervention to delay the onset of alcohol use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, racial/ethnic differences in patterns of alcohol use have been identifi ed, such that African American youth tend to have later onset (e.g., Wallace et al, 2003), and somewhat distinct developmental trajectories of alcohol use compared with White youth (Flory et al, 2006;Tucker et al, 2003). Little is known about possible racial/ethnic differences in the role of conduct problems in relation to the development of alcohol use, although some research suggests that externalizing behaviors may be a more important predictor of alcohol use in White, compared with African American, girls (e.g., Chung et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SEM analyses, race was characterized as either white or non-white as sub-sample sizes did not allow for more fine-tuned examination of racial and cultural differences (independent testing of the structural models showed that the only race category significantly related to the variables of interest was “white;” therefore, to maintain power across all components of the model, the racial predictor was dichotomized into white and non-white.). Grade level was included in MIMIC models of expectancies to determine whether expectancy scales were developmentally invariant (Chung, Hipwell, Loeber, White, & Stouthamer-Loeber, 2008; McCarthy et al, 2009; Schell et al, 2005). By testing for group differences in factor means and indicator intercepts, these MIMIC models evaluated measurement invariance for latent variables across these covariates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%