2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic Differences in Cancer Rates Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in New Zealand From 1994 to 2018

Abstract: IMPORTANCE People with type 2 diabetes have greater risk for some site-specific cancers, and risks of cancers differ among racial and ethnic groups in the general population of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we accounted for the presence of treatments such as antihypertensive, anticoagulant, and lipid‐lowering drugs by index date. To assess the socioeconomic status of participants, we utilized the NZDep2013 Index of Deprivation, which assigns an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score to each meshblock in New Zealand based on the distribution of the first principal component scores 20 . The IMD score ranges from 1 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower levels of deprivation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we accounted for the presence of treatments such as antihypertensive, anticoagulant, and lipid‐lowering drugs by index date. To assess the socioeconomic status of participants, we utilized the NZDep2013 Index of Deprivation, which assigns an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score to each meshblock in New Zealand based on the distribution of the first principal component scores 20 . The IMD score ranges from 1 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower levels of deprivation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the socioeconomic status of participants, we utilized the NZDep2013 Index of Deprivation, which assigns an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score to each meshblock in New Zealand based on the distribution of the first principal component scores. 20 The IMD score ranges from 1 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower levels of deprivation. To ensure sufficient statistical power, we categorized the IMD into five groups: IMD‐1 (least deprived: NZDep2013 scores of 1–2), IMD‐2, IMD‐3, IMD‐4 (scores of 3–4, 5–6, and 7–8, respectively), and IMD‐5 (most deprived: scores of 9–10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomic status was determined using the NZDep2013 Index of Deprivation, which measures the level of deprivation in a given area. 22 The NZDep2013 assigns an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score for each New Zealand meshblock (geographic unit containing a median of 81 people). 22 Scores on the NZDep2013 scale of deprivation range from 1 to 10, with lower scores indicating less deprivation; the scale divides New Zealand into tenths of the distribution of the first principal component scores and was consistent with prior deprivation measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 22 The NZDep2013 assigns an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score for each New Zealand meshblock (geographic unit containing a median of 81 people). 22 Scores on the NZDep2013 scale of deprivation range from 1 to 10, with lower scores indicating less deprivation; the scale divides New Zealand into tenths of the distribution of the first principal component scores and was consistent with prior deprivation measures. 23 To maintain statistical power, the IMD was recategorized into 5 groups: IMD‐1 (least deprived: NZDep2013 scores of 1–2); IMD‐2, IMD‐3, and IMD‐4 (NZDep2013 scores of 3–4, 5–6, and 7–8, respectively); and IMD‐5 (most deprived: NZDep2013 scores of 9–10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Māori and Pacific populations are disproportionately affected by both diabetes and cancer, we might expect the burden of cancer and diabetes co-occurrence to be greater for these population groups. 17 However, prevalence data for cancer and diabetes co-occurrence in NZ are limited, with most evidence coming from clinical audits with limited sample sizes, 18 - 20 regional investigations, 17 or national investigations that used only hospitalization records to define diabetes status (with low sensitivity and hence underascertainment of diabetes). 21 Robust national evidence of ethnic differences in the likelihood of cancer diagnosis among those with and without diabetes, stratified by cancer, is urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%