2009
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic Differences and Functional Analysis of MET Mutations in Lung Cancer

Abstract: Purpose: African Americans have higher incidence and poorer response to lung cancer treatment compared with Caucasians. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for the significant ethnic difference are not known. The present study examines the ethnic differences in the type and frequency of MET proto-oncogene (MET) mutation in lung cancer and correlated them with other frequently mutated genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS2, and TP53. Experimental Design: Using tumor tissue genomic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
147
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
147
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also present the results of a retrospective analysis of African-American patients with NSCLC seen at our institution, showing a significantly higher prevalence of EGFR mutations in this patient population than previously reported in the literature. (Yang et al, 2005;Krishnaswamy et al, 2009;Leidner et al, 2009). Additionally, we present data on the molecular and functional characterization of three exon 20 mutations found in African-American patients with NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We also present the results of a retrospective analysis of African-American patients with NSCLC seen at our institution, showing a significantly higher prevalence of EGFR mutations in this patient population than previously reported in the literature. (Yang et al, 2005;Krishnaswamy et al, 2009;Leidner et al, 2009). Additionally, we present data on the molecular and functional characterization of three exon 20 mutations found in African-American patients with NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…MET alterations included two different missense mutations in the JM domain (R988C found in NCI-H69 and H249 cell lines; and T1010I in SCLC tumor sample). Also, a semaphorin domain missense mutation (E168D in SCLC tumor sample), two-base-pair insertional mutations [IVS13- (52)(53)insCT in SCLC tumor samples] within the pre-JM intron 13, as well as an alternative transcript involving exon 10 (H128 cell line), were identified (42). The two reported JM mutations affected cell proliferation, resulting in small but significant growth factor independence in the IL3-dependent BaF3 cell line, and were found to regulate cell morphology and adhesion, and enhanced tumorigenicity when introduced into an SCLC cell line (42).…”
Section: Met Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one patient with largecell carcinoma who was treated for over 5 months, there was a partial response comprising a 53% reduction in tumor, and in the other patient, who had squamous NSCLC that had failed prior therapies and was treated for 13 months, there was a partial response comprising a 61% reduction in tumor (43). MET mutations in the semaphorin domain have been shown to affect ligand binding: MET-N375S, the most frequent mutation of MET, most common among male smokers and squamous cell carcinoma, confers resistance to MET inhibition based on HGF binding, molecular modeling, and apoptotic susceptibility to MET inhibitor studies (53).…”
Section: Met Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So a robust genotyping platform which can carry-on daily routine testing is need. Other multiplex genetic mutation-detection methods have been reported, such as Cancer Personalized Profiling by deep sequencing and SNaPShot 7,15 . Molecular characterization via MALDI-TOF on MassARRAY platform, which is characterized by high throughput, high sensitivity, and a simple operation, can be implemented by combining single-base extension and mass spectrometry technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%