International organisations play many different roles during election processes in new and emerging democracies (and in countries hoping to be seen as democracies). These roles-and their impactbecome particularly interesting during situations that develop into 'an electoral crisis'. An electoral crisis is some kind of humanitarian or political (or other) crisis, where administrative or other problems in relation to an electoral process function as the trigger of the crisis. Many such crises have occurred over recent years, but this article will focus on the Kenyan case of 2007 -08. The tragic violence and ethnic cleansing shocked the world during early 2008. The instrument established jointly by the government of Kenya and international organisations to investigate what went wrong and what should be done to remedy the situation was IREC, the Independent Review Commission. The article demonstrates how international organisations were involved during the electoral process and also makes clear that the considerable amount of international assistance before and during the election was of almost no avail, while it was more useful after the election. IREC's surprising conclusion was that the main problems in the elections were not the finalisation of the vote count and the tabulation or the subsequent presentation of results. One has to look to the country's ethnic composition and history, to Kenya's political culture, and to the incompetence of the Electoral Commission of Kenya to understand why the expectations of an exemplary electoral process were turned into such a misery, despite international assistance from the very beginning of the electoral process.The simultaneous presidential, parliamentary and civic elections in Kenya on 27 December 2007 were disastrous. They were not only disastrous because many of the politically most established and well-known losers did not accept their electoral fate-as they might have done if the election results had been credible to them-but also because serious election-related violence erupted, in some places even before results were known. However, most of the emotion and most of the violence only occurred after the official announcement of the winner of the presidential contest, i.e., the incumbent president, Hon. Mwai Kibaki of PNU (the Party of National Unity), and the surprisingly low-key swearing-in ceremony immediately thereafter. In most cases, the protesters shared the opinion that Hon. Raila Odinga of ODM (the Orange Democratic Movement) should have been declared the winner as he-at least by his supporters-was expected to have got more votes than Kibaki.Estimates of the number of deaths due to the violence oscillate between 1,000 and 1,500, the number of rapes and other forms of physical harassment and intimidation is unknown, and the number of internally displaced persons is anybody's guess, but it was probably in the vicinity of 400,000.