1984
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198410000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic and Sex Differences in Response to Clinical and Induced Pain in Chronic Spinal Pain Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains to be determined whether the forehead and/or the temples will prove to be best in studies of pain in clinical situations. Females have been observed to emphasize back pain more than males (18). Several studies (19,20) have found lower pain thresholds in females, and confirm the present results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It remains to be determined whether the forehead and/or the temples will prove to be best in studies of pain in clinical situations. Females have been observed to emphasize back pain more than males (18). Several studies (19,20) have found lower pain thresholds in females, and confirm the present results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Findings from this study support and extend similar pain investigations (Fillingim 2005;Edwards et al 2003;Campbell 2004Campbell ,2005Edwards and Fillingim 1999;and Zatzick and Dimsdale 1990). Although several studies have addressed ethnic differences and pain response in clinical studies (Edwards et al 2005Green 2005Green ,2003Campbell et al 2004;Riley 2002;Greenwald 1991), and some have included multiple ethnic groups (Edwards et al 2005;Hastie, et al 2005;Watson et al 2005;Faucett et al 1994;Lawlis et al 1984;Lipton and Marbach 1984), a unique contribution of this study is the inclusion of both Hispanics and African Americans in a comparative study of experimental pain and ethnic identity. Consistent with previous investigators (Campbell et al, 2005;Edwards, et al, 2003;Edwards and Fillingim,1991;Rollman and Harris, 1987;Wolff, 1971;Gelfand, 1964 Wolff andJarvik, 1963), the most robust ethnic group differences in this study emerged for measures of pain tolerance compared to pain threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…An additional purpose of the study, which comprises the focus of this report, was to examine racial differences in the association of prior mood disorders with experimental pain sensitivity. Given the evidence that Hispanic populations differ in clinical pain symptoms 26 and are more sensitive to experimental pain than non-Hispanic whites 31 and since the numbers of Hispanics (n ϭ 3), Native Americans (n ϭ 1), Asians (n ϭ 2), and multiracial women (n ϭ 1) in our study did not allow for valid analyses, the present report compares African Americans with non-Hispanic whites only. Therefore, 32 African American women and 23 non-Hispanic white women are included in the present report.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%