Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
A Companion to American Immigration
DOI: 10.1002/9780470997116.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic and Racial Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "South Asian" frame is a simple and familiar one for the American audience, as it is largely consistent with contemporary racial dynamics and how most white Americans think about Indonesians, Indians, Sri Lankans and Thai in the US racial classification system, immigrants and nationals of tsunami impacted South Asian countries have been classified in a "pan-ethnic" racial classification of "Asian", rather than by their nationality or ethnic origin (Boheme 1989;Espiritu 1992;Feagin 2000;Omi & Winant 1994;Takaki 1993). This "Asian" frame de-contextualizes cultural differences between groups and emphasizes physical similarities between members in an effort to simplify the cultural and historical differences as homogenous to the dominant white majority in the United States (Espiritu 1992;Feagin 2000;Halter 2006;Omi & Winant 1994;Portes & Rumbaut 2001). Of course, South Asians or Asians are not fully integrated into the dominant white racial hierarchy.…”
Section: Solidarity Fostered Through Simplification and Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "South Asian" frame is a simple and familiar one for the American audience, as it is largely consistent with contemporary racial dynamics and how most white Americans think about Indonesians, Indians, Sri Lankans and Thai in the US racial classification system, immigrants and nationals of tsunami impacted South Asian countries have been classified in a "pan-ethnic" racial classification of "Asian", rather than by their nationality or ethnic origin (Boheme 1989;Espiritu 1992;Feagin 2000;Omi & Winant 1994;Takaki 1993). This "Asian" frame de-contextualizes cultural differences between groups and emphasizes physical similarities between members in an effort to simplify the cultural and historical differences as homogenous to the dominant white majority in the United States (Espiritu 1992;Feagin 2000;Halter 2006;Omi & Winant 1994;Portes & Rumbaut 2001). Of course, South Asians or Asians are not fully integrated into the dominant white racial hierarchy.…”
Section: Solidarity Fostered Through Simplification and Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%