2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.jgp.0000235710.17450.9a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic and Educational Differences in Cognitive Test Performance on Mini-Mental State Examination in Asians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
139
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
139
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, participants were screened using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [15,16]. Participants with an MMSE score below 27 or MMSE decline of ≥1 point per year were further assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale [17] and a standardized battery of detailed neurocognitive tests (see Ng et al [14]), additional blood tests, clinical examination, and brain magnetic resonance imaging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, participants were screened using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [15,16]. Participants with an MMSE score below 27 or MMSE decline of ≥1 point per year were further assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale [17] and a standardized battery of detailed neurocognitive tests (see Ng et al [14]), additional blood tests, clinical examination, and brain magnetic resonance imaging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores denoting better cognitive function. We used the Chinese version of the MMSE which had been previously validated in an independent study [27] to have high sensitivity (95.5%) and specificity (83.5%) in detecting dementia in Chinese older adults, using a cutoff of 23/24. Respondents with MMSE scores of 23 or less were classified as cognitively impaired.…”
Section: Cognitive Status At Baseline and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local translated versions of the instrument with a cutoff of 23/24 (97.5% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity; AUC: 95%) that was used to determine cognitive impairment have been validated for local use in Singaporean older adults (30).…”
Section: Other Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%