1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)90626-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethidium binding sites on plasmid DNA determined by photoaffinity labeling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibition of Mbol activity on B-form BZ-III by actinomycin, ametantrone, and ethidium is expected and is similar to that observed previously with various restriction enzymes and DNA-binding molecules (Hardwick et al, 1984;Ushay et al, 1981; Barton & Paranawithana, 1986; Mallamaci et al, 1991). Inhibition by these agents of Mbol cleavage of BZ-III containing both B and Z conformations is also observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The inhibition of Mbol activity on B-form BZ-III by actinomycin, ametantrone, and ethidium is expected and is similar to that observed previously with various restriction enzymes and DNA-binding molecules (Hardwick et al, 1984;Ushay et al, 1981; Barton & Paranawithana, 1986; Mallamaci et al, 1991). Inhibition by these agents of Mbol cleavage of BZ-III containing both B and Z conformations is also observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The most likely explanation for this difference is twofold: drug destabilization of the NaeI-L43K-DNA complex and the transient nature of the covalent NaeI-L43K-DNA intermediate. Intercalating drugs destabilize the interaction of restriction enzymes with DNA (Goppelt et al, 1981;Hardwick et al, 1984). DNA relaxation reactions without inhibitor present (Jo & Topal, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a clear concentration-dependent fashion, increasing amounts of ligand resulted in the binding of multiple units of ethidium bromide and mitoxantrone. For these ligands, a maximum stoichiometry of three units was observed, consistent with the number of possible binding sites present between adjacent GC pairs, which are particularly favorable to intercalation (21,22). The minor groove binder distamycin A afforded lower stoichiometries and reduced affinity, which is not surprising as the Ty3 PPT lacks contiguous AT base pairs preferred by this class (23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%