2002
DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2002.10491774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics Review of Research Projects Involving Human Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, Oliver (2002) is of the opinion that the research ethics review of research projects that generally pose little physical or mental risk, as is the case in most undergraduate research projects, stands a real danger of being unduly delayed through a review process characterized by exaggerated caution. However, this does not preclude the crucial role of RECs, and the need for research ethics review for undergraduate-level projects involving human research participants should not be compromised in this endeavor (Oliver, 2002). RECs usually have a system of expedited review for minimal risk studies, which can significantly reduce the ethics review turnover time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Oliver (2002) is of the opinion that the research ethics review of research projects that generally pose little physical or mental risk, as is the case in most undergraduate research projects, stands a real danger of being unduly delayed through a review process characterized by exaggerated caution. However, this does not preclude the crucial role of RECs, and the need for research ethics review for undergraduate-level projects involving human research participants should not be compromised in this endeavor (Oliver, 2002). RECs usually have a system of expedited review for minimal risk studies, which can significantly reduce the ethics review turnover time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%