2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2006.tb00322.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics Research: an Accounting Educator's Perspective

Abstract: This review of ethics education in accounting shows the contributions of, and gaps in, existing work. The investigation can contribute directly to an ethics educational program, while shedding light on topics that could be usefully extended. The paper is structured uniquely for educational interests by forming primary categories around the needs of the educational manager and the classroom educator; subcategories are drawn from the literature itself. The analysis anchors on McDonald and Donleavy's (1995) revie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research includes the study of various approaches to ethics training (Armstrong, Ketz & Owsen 2003;Cameron & O'Leary 2015;Dobie & Plant 2014;Ghaffari, Kyriacou & Brennan 2008;Gray, Bebbington & McPhail 1994;Jackling et al 2007;Langlois & Lapointe 2010;Liu, Yao & Hu 2012;Massey & Van Hise 2009;O'Leary 2012;Rossouw 2013;Spurgin 2004;West & Buckby 2020), as well as various studies that assess the impact that the timing, duration, faculty of the presenter, training methods, underlying ethics theories, different learning outcomes, etc. (Blanthorne, Kovar & Fisher 2007;Christensen, Cote & Latham 2018;Collins, Weber & Zambrano 2014;Harasym et al 2013;Loeb 1991;Madison & Schmidt 2006;Mintz 1995;Peursem & Julian 2006;Preuss 1998;Sedaghat, Mintz & Wright 2011;Sorensen, Miller & Cabe 2017) have on the effectiveness of the training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research includes the study of various approaches to ethics training (Armstrong, Ketz & Owsen 2003;Cameron & O'Leary 2015;Dobie & Plant 2014;Ghaffari, Kyriacou & Brennan 2008;Gray, Bebbington & McPhail 1994;Jackling et al 2007;Langlois & Lapointe 2010;Liu, Yao & Hu 2012;Massey & Van Hise 2009;O'Leary 2012;Rossouw 2013;Spurgin 2004;West & Buckby 2020), as well as various studies that assess the impact that the timing, duration, faculty of the presenter, training methods, underlying ethics theories, different learning outcomes, etc. (Blanthorne, Kovar & Fisher 2007;Christensen, Cote & Latham 2018;Collins, Weber & Zambrano 2014;Harasym et al 2013;Loeb 1991;Madison & Schmidt 2006;Mintz 1995;Peursem & Julian 2006;Preuss 1998;Sedaghat, Mintz & Wright 2011;Sorensen, Miller & Cabe 2017) have on the effectiveness of the training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research includes the study of various approaches to ethics training (Armstrong, Ketz & Owsen 2003;Cameron & O'Leary 2015;Dobie & Plant 2014;Ghaffari, Kyriacou & Brennan 2008;Gray, Bebbington & McPhail 1994;Jackling et al 2007;Langlois & Lapointe 2010;Liu, Yao & Hu 2012;Massey & Van Hise 2009;O'Leary 2012;Rossouw 2013;Spurgin 2004;West & Buckby 2020), as well as various studies that assess the impact that the timing, duration, faculty of the presenter, training methods, underlying ethics theories, different learning outcomes, etc. (Blanthorne, Kovar & Fisher 2007;Christensen, Cote & Latham 2018;Collins, Weber & Zambrano 2014;Harasym et al 2013;Loeb 1991;Madison & Schmidt 2006;Mintz 1995;Peursem & Julian 2006;Preuss 1998;Sedaghat, Mintz & Wright 2011;Sorensen, Miller & Cabe 2017) have on the effectiveness of the training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research includes the study of various approaches to ethics training (Armstrong, Ketz & Owsen 2003;Cameron & O'Leary 2015;Dobie & Plant 2014;Ghaffari, Kyriacou & Brennan 2008;Gray, Bebbington & McPhail 1994;Jackling et al 2007;Langlois & Lapointe 2010;Liu, Yao & Hu 2012;Massey & Van Hise 2009;O'Leary 2012;Rossouw 2013;Spurgin 2004;West & Buckby 2020), as well as various studies that assess the impact that the timing, duration, faculty of the presenter, training methods, underlying ethics theories, different learning outcomes, etc. (Blanthorne, Kovar & Fisher 2007;Christensen, Cote & Latham 2018;Collins, Weber & Zambrano 2014;Harasym et al 2013;Loeb 1991;Madison & Schmidt 2006;Mintz 1995;Peursem & Julian 2006;Preuss 1998;Sedaghat, Mintz & Wright 2011;Sorensen, Miller & Cabe 2017) have on the effectiveness of the training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%