2015
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.o.00564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics of Provider Risk Factor Modification in Total Joint Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is unique among the current literature in that it was performed at a single, high-volume institution. Previous database studies cannot control for lower socioeconomic patients more often presenting to low-volume centers [18]. There are inherent limitations in the retrospective nature of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study is unique among the current literature in that it was performed at a single, high-volume institution. Previous database studies cannot control for lower socioeconomic patients more often presenting to low-volume centers [18]. There are inherent limitations in the retrospective nature of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, patients with lower socioeconomic status and perceived modifiable risk factors, both groups whom have traditionally had less access to care, may face additional challenges in obtaining care [17]. Aggressive risk factor modification and patient selection is ethically challenging given those who are underinsured or uninsured are the patients who suffer the most loss of access [18]. But socioeconomic status may be an even more important risk factor for healthcare utilization and subsequently penalization under the CJR after total hip replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Efficient delivery of medical care minimizes the financial stress on the healthcare system. 37 It has been demonstrated that rates of revision surgery and mortality after TJA are less with high-volume physicians and centers than with low-volume alternatives (,125 cases per year). [37][38][39] However, patients referred from a local community hospital to high-volume regional centers might travel more than 50 to 100 miles to minimize the provider risk.…”
Section: Risk Factor Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 It has been demonstrated that rates of revision surgery and mortality after TJA are less with high-volume physicians and centers than with low-volume alternatives (,125 cases per year). [37][38][39] However, patients referred from a local community hospital to high-volume regional centers might travel more than 50 to 100 miles to minimize the provider risk. 37 This outmigration of TJA to regionalized centers might cause a negative effect on low-volume centers and local communities.…”
Section: Risk Factor Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation